Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM by Maurice Berger
Don't forget to check out our newest feature: Voices on the Ground. Voices is our public forum for observations and images (including photographs and YouTube content) about Election 2008. It's another way that PollTrack lives
up to its motto of tracking the election from the ground up. Keep your
eyes and ears open--and let us know what you see or hear in your
community (or in your travels).
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 1:59 PM by Maurice Berger
Based on a recent modest up tick in John McCain's numbers in the state (which had been sagging recently), PollTrack moves Indiana back into the "Leaning Republican" column on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 11:22 AM by Maurice Berger
On our new Voices on the Ground page, reader Oliver Wasow asks about the Barr/Nader factor and whether third party candidates can make a difference in this election. While Ralph Nader and Bob Barr are barely registering in national polls--their PollTrack averages are 3% and 1.5% respectively--they can make a difference in this election. Take the new ABC News/Washington Post Poll released this evening: Obama 50% to McCain 46%, a net plus of 4% for Obama. Add in the two third party candidates, and the numbers change subtly, but significantly: Obama 48%, McCain 45%, Nader 3%, Barr 2%. There is no guarantee that Nader and Barr will continue to draw the same level of support on election day; but the reverse is also true--their numbers could increase. If the election draws closer again--keep in mind, that the three point margin for Obama is within the poll's margin of error--third party candidates could draw away enough votes from the Democrat or Republican to swing a very close state or two.
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 8:47 AM by Maurice Berger
The PPP survey released today in Florida (see below) had another significant finding that mirrors a number of other statewide polls across the nation in recent days--Sarah Palin's popularity is faltering: "Palin's net favorability with Florida voters has dropped 12 points over the last three weeks," the survey reports. Is this another reason for the decline in McCain's numbers? Palin's debate performance seems crucial: it could either further her decline with voters or give her (and the ticket) a boost, after a bad week. One thing is certain: the Alaska governor remains popular with Evangelical and conservative Christian voters as well as other sectors of the Republican base. Her success with this constituency is crucial to the success of the ticket in November. But will Palin continue to appeal to the all-important independent demographic or to working class white women? And, in the end, will voter perceptions about her have any demonstrative effect on the election?
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 6:35 AM by Maurice Berger
A new Public Policy Polling survey in Florida suggests that the faltering economy is helping Obama in the state, who now leads by 3% (PollTrack's average still gives McCain a minute +0.03% lead): "64%
of Floridians surveyed say the economy is their top issue, and Obama
has a 55-40 lead with those voters. In a January PPP poll just 26% of
voters in the state said they were most concerned with the economy. The
events of the last few weeks seem in particular to have helped move
independents into the Obama camp. Three weeks ago the candidates were
tied, now Obama has a 48-40 advantage with those voters."
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 4:56 AM by Maurice Berger
With the most recent polls in Florida indicating a tie--and McCain's average lead in the state withering down to a tiny +0.3%--PollTrack moves FL from "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 3:55 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has new a new projection for its Election Day Map: Obama 269/McCain 225. Our long-term prediction now sees Virgina, Florida, and New Hampshire as "Too Close To Call."
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 2:36 AM by Maurice Berger
In a bit of news that seems antithetical to Obama's improving poll numbers, a statewide poll released yesterday by Middle Tennessee State University reports that Democrat is still having a problem winning over voters who supported Hillary Clinton in Tennessee's primary back in February. If the election remains close, this "Clinton gap" could spell trouble for the Democrat. MTSU observes: "The McCain campaign seems to have had modest success at attracting
supporters of former Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, whom 22
percent of Tennesseans say they voted for in the Democratic primary. A
quarter of those who voted for the junior senator from New York in
Tennessee’s Democratic presidential primary say that they would now
vote for McCain and Palin in the general election. However, 56 percent
of those who report that they voted for Clinton in the primary say that
they would now vote for Obama and Biden. The rest of Clinton’s
supporters remain undecided at this point or say they would vote for
someone other than McCain or Obama." Overall, McCain's PollTrack average in the state is a healthy +14%.
Posted Sep 30, 2008 at 1:09 AM by Maurice Berger
In another sign that McCain may be having trouble holding onto to traditional Republican territory, the PollTrack average for Virginia now shows Obama with a tiny lead of +1.4%. Though very small, the Democrat's advantage means something in a state that has voted Republican in every presidential cycle since 1964 (Lyndon Johnson won the state that year in an electoral landslide against Republican Barry Goldwater).
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 11:55 AM by Maurice Berger
A Public Policy Polling survey, released this afternoon, reveals one important reason for Obama's dramatic upswing in North Carolina: the economy. The poll found that, "over the last year there's been a strong relationship between the
number of North Carolinians listing the economy as their biggest concern, and
Obama's standing in the polls. In January when just 39% of voters said it was
their biggest issue John McCain led by 14 points. In August with it up to 48%
Obama trailed by just three. Last week with 58% listing it number one the race
was tied, and now with the number up to a record 64% Obama has taken a small
lead. He is up 55-38 among respondents citing the economy as their main
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 8:14 AM by Maurice Berger
Obama has pulled ahead in PollTrack's average for North Carolina, albeit by a tiny (and statistically insignificant) lead of +0.7%. What is significant, however, is that McCain's lead in the state two weeks ago was strong enough to fall into the "Safe Republican" category. Last week was, indeed, brutal for the Arizona Senator. NC should be easy Republican turf, so any movement towards the blue zone, even to this very slight degree, is a real warning sign for the McCain campaign.
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 7:31 AM by Maurice Berger
With a slew of recent polls indicating a average lead for Obama of +4.8%, PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 7:02 AM by Maurice Berger
Today's daily tracking poll average shows Obama up by 4%, a drop of 2.3 from yesterday. What does this mean? Perhaps nothing. Rolling samples taken mostly over the weekend are often unreliable, since its harder to capture representative samples as leisure-time activities draw large blocs of voters out of the home (and away from pollsters' phone calls). It could be the inclusion of the GW/Battleground daily tracker in today's average--a poll not issued on Saturday or Sunday--that is driving the Democrat's numbers slightly downward. (The poll has consistently given McCain a modest lead of 1% to 2% over the past week, contradicting other surveys. The pollster's models for likelihood of turnout and party affiliation and enthusiasm may be responsible for this variation.) Or is the bloc of undecided voters--that 8% to 12% of the electorate now in the middle--fluid and therefor easily impressed by shifting news events or campaign strategies? In a few days, these samples may settle into something approximating a trend. Or not. Stay tuned.
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM by Maurice Berger
Yesterday's PollTrack daily tracking average gave Obama a significant 6.3% edge. These results suggest that last week was a bad one for John McCain. His assertion that the "fundamentals of the economy are strong"--just days before the full gravity of our economic crisis became clear did not help his numbers. Surveys last week also indicated that the electorate is inclined to blame Republicans for the economic mess. Additionally, Sarah Palin took a hammering in the media as did McCain's effort to suspend his campaign. The big question: has the economic crisis--and McCain's response to it--provided Obama with an opening? Do Obama's numbers indicate that the tide is turning in election 2008? Or will the pendulum swing back in the coming weeks? October is a tricky month in presidential campaigns, a time when voter sentiment can harden, but also a period in which the debates, political strategies, and unexpected news events have made a difference (to wit, the expression, "October Surprise"). Al Gore began October 2000 with an large deficit in the polls. By month's end, he was tied with his opponent, winning 500,000 more votes than George W. Bush on election day. Conversely, in October 1988, a series of withering Republican campaign commercials and weak debate performances by Democrat Michael Dukakis resulted in a durable Republican advantage that carried George H. W. Bush well across the finish line. Yet, in 1980, the one--and only debate--between Reagan and Carter in late October shook up a heretofore tied up race and yielded the Republican a stable and significant lead. One major qualifier: US presidential elections are not decided by the popular vote (as 2000 dramatically confirmed). In this sense, neither candidate has come anywhere near sealing the deal. In fact, from an electoral perspective, the race is closer to a tie than Obama's modest national lead might suggest. More later.
Posted Sep 29, 2008 at 12:49 AM by Maurice Berger
According to a poll released last night by Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times, last Thursday's presidential debate "changed the preferences of few voters,
reinforcing previous perceptions about the candidates' strengths and
continuing to give Sen. Barack Obama an advantage over Sen. John
McCain. . . . Obama scored much higher among these voters on the
economy, as he did in a national poll last week, and McCain reaffirmed
the perception that he is better on national security." Several other polls released on Sunday suggested that voters, by varying margins, gave the debate win to the Democrat. What effect these perceptions will have on the election is unclear.
Posted Sep 28, 2008 at 9:14 AM by Maurice Berger
As last week drew to a close, the state of Michigan began to show signs of life for Obama. PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close to Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map, thus concluding that the recent statewide trend towards the Democrat (as reported this morning) may continue this week.
Posted Sep 28, 2008 at 2:28 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack's state-by-state analysis of the electoral map suggests that Obama is now in a better position to reach 270 electoral votes. Why? Because most of the states that are now rated "Too Close To Call" have gone Republican in recent cycles (FL, VA, IN, OH, CO, NV, NC) versus two that have gone blue (MN, PA) and one more that has flipped in the last two presidential races (NH). Furthermore, at this point, Obama is in a slightly better position in the two blue swing states than McCain is in most of the red, where the Republican now leads in six, but by just a few points, and trails in the seventh (CO). This suggests--at this point in time--that Obama is having an easier time holding onto his turf than McCain. Can this electoral equation shift? Absolutely, and did in the weeks following the Republican convention, when McCain pulled into the stronger position. The danger for McCain, however, is that the race has returned, more or less, to pre-convention numbers that had remained stable since June. In other words, with the race back to where it was--with Obama holding a modest but discernible lead--it is possible that the wave of support that the Democrat has ridden for all but a few weeks could solidify, making it much more difficult for McCain to reclaim the momentum. For Obama, the danger lies in the electoral math if the race should remain close: even if he wins all of the states won by Democrat John Kerry in 2004--including NH, where the race is now a virtual tie--he will still need to pick off Ohio or several other states that have gone Republican in recent years. The next few weeks will be very important for both candidates.
Posted Sep 28, 2008 at 1:09 AM by Maurice Berger
With the only survey indicating a lead for McCain in Michigan (MRG of Lansing) now more than a week old and five new polls indicating a significant upswing in support for Obama, PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 27, 2008 at 5:11 AM by Maurice Berger
Reflecting a week of numbers trending upward in battleground states, Obama's national daily tracking poll average lead this afternoon is +5.3%. The tally today: Obama 49%/McCain 43.7%. PollTrack cautions not to read too much into these numbers vis-a-vis last night's debate, since the lion's share of survey samples were taken before the event (daily tracking results represent a rolling average of three to four days).
Posted Sep 27, 2008 at 2:49 AM by Maurice Berger
Obama's relentless and enthusiastic campaigning in Iowa during the primary and caucus season may have paid off. While the race continues to be relatively close in a number of contiguous states (MN, MO, WI, for example), the Democrat is pulling ahead in Iowa. PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning" to "Safe Democrat" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 27, 2008 at 12:39 AM by Maurice Berger
One debate down. Three to go. PollTrack cautions gainst reading too much into public opinion surveys over the next few days. Momentum over the past week has gone modestly in Obama's direction in a number of battleground states. In the ten days before that, McCain pulled into a small lead nationally and improved his standing in some of these states. In the absence of a startling blooper or knock-out punch--neither of which appears to have happened in last night's debate--the lead may remain with Obama. Still, the political unconscious is a complex and unpredictable part of the formation of voter sentiment. Yes, the next few days of polling may reveal something approximating an early response to the debate. More likely, it will continue to reflect an electorate that is uncertain and anxious, especially in the midst of--and now I quote both candidates--the "worst economic crisis in our lifetime." Right now, this anxiety appears to be benefiting the Democrat. But down the road, the question remains: Did something--a particular answer, a style, a mannerism, psychological quirk, or tick--work its way into unconscious perceptions about the candidates? And could this "something" eventually blow the race open?
Posted Sep 26, 2008 at 7:13 AM by Maurice Berger
With most polls showing Pennsylvania trending back to Obama (to a modest degree), PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM by Maurice Berger
The presidential debates could matter a lot in this election. No matter who is leading in any individual poll, all surveys report a fairly significant bloc of undecided voters, anywhere from 5% to 18%. PollTrack guesses that voters are pretty confused right now. While each candidate can count on a solid bloc of very committed voters, neither candidate consistently breaks the 50% in PT's national daily and periodic polling averages. The wavering segment in the middle--unaffiliated, independent, and undecided voters--has been fairly fluid the past two months, affording both candidates the lead at one point. One widely quoted article reported this week "the norm is for very little swing in candidate support" in the period immediately following presidential debates. PollTrack cautions against reading too much into voters' initial responses to the candidate's debate performance. Yet, debates have mattered a great deal. But their effect takes time to enter into voter's conscious and unconscious decision making. Most important, debates can affirm or allay doubts already present in the minds of voters: Michael Dukakis's dispassionate answer to a 1988 hypothetical debate question about whether his liberal views on crime and justice would be shaken if his wife were raped went right to voters' concerns about his clinical and unemotional approach to politics and governing. Conversely, Ronald Reagan's adept and reassuring debate performance in 1980 convinced voters that he was not, as many feared, an extremist out of touch with the middle of the country. PollTrack imagines that the debates in this cycle could well have a similar and powerful effect on the electorate.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 at 1:40 AM by Maurice Berger
Three polls in a row--Rasmussen, Civitas, and PPP--report that the race in North Carolina is a virtual tie, with Obama leading by 2% in one, the others a dead heat. PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 at 1:35 AM by Maurice Berger
While McCain's numbers in Florida have remained relatively static, Obama's appear to be improving slightly in recent days. As a result, PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 at 1:34 AM by Maurice Berger
With the numbers getting closer in the most recent polls out of Missouri, PollTrack moves the state from "Safe" to "Leaning Republican on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM by Maurice Berger
Michigan is one state that may go back and forth this election season. On the basis of several new polls released over the past 24 hours, it would seem that the people of the great state are having troubling making up their minds (or pollsters are having a hard time making up their's). As reported earlier, the state's economy is doing poorly, and statewide public opinion surveys suggest that Michigan's Democratic governor is unpopular right now (see below, 24-Sep/Michigan: Movement on Today's Map). Thus, the economy may well cut both ways for the national contest as a political issue in the state. How schizophrenic are the numbers? Take a look: MRG of Lansing: McCain +3%. NBC/Mason Dixon: a tie, at 46% to 46%. Detroit Free Press: Obama +13 (yes, 51% to 38%). PollTrack leaves the state "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map and will pay very close attention to the next round of statewide polling and its internal data.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 8:26 AM by Maurice Berger
On the basis of the most recent surveys in North Carolina, PollTrack moves the state from "Safe" to "Leaning Republican" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 6:38 AM by Maurice Berger
With the lead in New Hampshire see-sawing in recent polling, PollTrack moves the state from WIN-Obama to "Too Close To Call" on Election Day Map Today.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 5:25 AM by Maurice Berger
Four daily tracking polls released today all indicate improvement for McCain. Gallup now calls the race a tie at 46% (from a +6% lead for the Democrat only five days ago). Battleground continues to give McCain a razor-thin lead: 48% to 47%. And Hotline/FD and Rasmussen both indicate a small drop in Obama's numbers over the past three days. Obama now holds a 1.5% lead in the PollTrack national daily tracking poll average: 47.3% to 45.8%.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 AM by Maurice Berger
With statewide polls in New Hampshire showing the race tightening--and more ominously for the Democrats, incumbent Republican John Sununu taking the lead in the US Senate race from Democratic challenger Jeanne Shaheen--PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning Democrat" to "Too Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 1:39 AM by Maurice Berger
With Obama's numbers improving in a number of battleground states, the candidate still appears to have a problem with independent voters. Yesterday's NBC/Wall Street Journal survey reports that in this key demographic, McCain
leads Obama by 14%, up 6% from a month earlier. And while voters overall say they identify with
Obama's values and background by a 50%-44% margin, those numbers are essentially
reversed among independents. Obama leads overall in the poll by +2%: 48% to 46%.
Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 1:21 AM by Maurice Berger
Do pollsters under-represent younger voters by excluding from their samples voters who use cell phones exclusively? Pew Research seems to think so:
After including cell phone-only households in three recent polls, the organization notes "a virtually identical pattern is seen across all three surveys:
In each case, including cell phone interviews resulted in slightly more
support for Obama and slightly less for McCain, a consistent difference
of two-to-three points in the margin." PollTrack wonders: why then did many public opinion surveys during the Democratic primary season routinely OVER estimate Obama's actual support? And to what extent are pollsters' attempts to weight their samples to correct this deficit solving or adding to the problem? Another question: how do we evaluate Pew's reported discrepancy if the election is not until November and there are no hard results against which to gauge their polling estimates?
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 11:13 AM by Maurice Berger
With Obama's numbers in Iowa perking up in recent polling, PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning" to "Safe Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 7:28 AM by Maurice Berger
With new numbers just in from Hawaii, PollTrack has a milestone to report: we now have poll averages for every state on Today's Map. Only DC remains unpolled. Remember: Roll over a state for poll averages, click for commentary.
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 4:16 AM by Maurice Berger
One the basis of new polling numbers, PollTrack moves South Carolina from "Leaning" to "Safe Republican."
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 4:11 AM by Maurice Berger
While PollTrack recently moved Michigan to "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map, it left it "To Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map. Why? Because the state may not behave like its neighbors in this cycle. The local Democratic party is doing poorly in the state--especially Govenor Jennifer Granholm--blamed for the local and especially harsh downturn in the economy. While the Democratic brand may be helping Obama right now in a number of states, it may be hurting him in Michigan, where his PT average lead just dropped below the 4% mark and a new Marketing Resource Group of Lansing poll shows McCain up by 3%--46% to 43%. Thus PollTrack moves the state back to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 3:52 AM by Maurice Berger
National polls are all over the pace this morning. It all depends on the polling organization you read. Battleground has McCain up 2%. ABC News/Washington Post has Obama up 9%. Some surveys show a close race (Ipsos-McClathcy: 44% to 43% Obama), others a statistically significant lead (Obama is +6% in Hotline/FD daily tracking poll). What's going on? For one, there are significant variations in the way these surveys measure party affiliation, voter intensity, and the likelihood of voting. Push the number in favor of a huge Democratic turnout and Obama leads accordingly, Draw them back to traditional levels of voter turnout and intensity and McCain leads or ties. Just as important: the nation may well be stunned and confused by last week's devastating economic news. Voter anxiety can cause swings in voter sentiment. One more factor to consider: the issue of how polling organizations pose questions to voters and in what order. Imagine an interview that begins with or emphasizes questions relating to the Wall Street crisis. This sample might skew in favor of the Democrats, given voters' inclination in recent polls to say that Obama and not McCain could best handle the economy.
Posted Sep 24, 2008 at 1:15 AM by Maurice Berger
The country is divided on more than just the election. A Washington Post-ABC News poll
released yesterday reports that the American public is "evenly divided on the recent steps taken by
the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department to rescue the financial
services industry -- 44% approve, 42% disapprove. Skepticism cuts across party lines: "Approval is under
50 percent among Republicans (49%), independents (46%) and Democrats
Posted Sep 23, 2008 at 9:05 AM by Maurice Berger
On the strength of Obama's numbers in the most recent polls coming out of Colorado, PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 23, 2008 at 5:02 AM by Maurice Berger
Despite the slight up tick in support for Obama this week, PollTrack's daily tracking poll national average shows the race once again drawing down to a virtual tie: 47.0% to 45.8%, giving the Democrat a scant 1.2% advantage. Nevertheless, Obama's numbers do seem to be improving in several battleground states, including Michigan and Colorado.
Posted Sep 23, 2008 at 3:56 AM by Maurice Berger
An Associated Press-Yahoo News survey released today reports that Barack Obama's support from former backers of Hillary Clinton "is stuck smack where it was in June . . . a
stunning lack of progress that is weakening him with fellow Democrats in the
close presidential race." The poll indicates that "among adults who backed his
rival during their bitter primary campaign, 58 percent now support Obama. That
is the same percentage who said so in June, when Clinton ended her bid and urged
her backers to line up behind the Democratic senator from Illinois."
Posted Sep 23, 2008 at 1:04 AM by Maurice Berger
On the basis of McCain's overall strength in Montana--and its voting patterns in presidential cycles (save for 1992, when Ross Perot's third party bid handed the state to Bill Clinton, its gone Republican in every election since 1964)--PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning" to "Safe Republican" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 AM by Maurice Berger
Despite recent suggestions that Sarah Palin's popularity is leveling off, a new Lifetime Television poll finds McCain's running
mate "has greatly increased the GOP ticket's appeal to women." One important finding: McCain-Palin holds a 44% to 42% lead over Obama-Biden on
who has a "better understanding of women and what is important" to
them. Obama's lead was a whopping 34% in July, 52% to 18%.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM by Maurice Berger
What PollTrack giveth, it sometimes must take away (on the same day). A University of New Hampshire poll released this hour suggests that Obama is not doing as well in the state as several recent polls suggest. Indeed, the survey gives McCain a modest 2% lead--47% to 45%. This number suggests a broader pattern and problem for the Obama campaign--connecting with white working class voters, even in a state like New Hampshire where the economy and political environment have recently favored Democrats. PollTrack now calls the state "Too Close To Call."
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM by Maurice Berger
New polling released today suggests that Michigan and Florida may be reverting to recent statewide electoral patterns. PollTrack now moves Florida from "Too Close To Call" To "Leaning Republican" and Michigan "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM by Maurice Berger
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released today reports that registered voters, by a two to one margin "blame Republicans over Democrats for the financial
crisis that has swept across the country the past few weeks — one
factor that may have contributed to an apparent increase in Barack
Obama’s edge over John McCain in the race for the White House." CNN continues: "47 percent of registered voters questioned say Republicans are more
responsible for the problems currently facing financial institutions
and the stock market, with 24 percent saying Democrats are more
responsible. One in five of those polled blame both parties equally,
and 8 percent say neither party is to blame."
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 7:42 AM by Maurice Berger
With the latest statewide survey suggesting improvement for Obama--and a political environment in the state that may favor the Democrats this year--PollTrack moves New Hampshire from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 7:37 AM by Maurice Berger
With recent polls suggesting that Obama's numbers are improving in Minnesota, PollTrack moves the state from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map. The state remains "To Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 3:41 AM by Maurice Berger
With McCain's lead growing dramatically in North Dakota--and word from Associated Press this morning that the Obama campaign has pulled much of its staff from the state and is redistributing workers to former Democratic strongholds MN and WI, where the race has grown extremely close--PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning" to "Safe Republican" on Today's Map. As the electoral landscape draws back to where it was in 2004--with the addition perhaps of VA as a viable new battleground state--is this yet another sign that the Democrat's 50-State strategy is not working?
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 1:54 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has analyzed statewide polling across the country and has now made calls in every state. If the election were held today, PollTrack predicts that Obama would win by eight electoral votes, 273 to 265. The map will change as trends develop, so check in often.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM by Maurice Berger
A bunch of new statewide polls suggest the race for electoral votes is as tight as the national contest. (For nearly a week, Rasmussen's daily tracker, like most others, has reported a dead heat, with Obama holding a razor-thin +1% lead. Battleground has McCain up by 1% this morning.) A Suffolk University survey in Nevada shows McCain just one point ahead of Obama (his overall PT average is + 1.7%). Alarming for the Democrats is Pennsylvania, where Obama's lead has whittled down to 2% in the latest NBC News/Mason-Dixon poll. (PollTrack saw this coming twelve days ago, when most analysts continued to call the state blue.) And Rasmussen has McCain ahead in North Carolina by only 3%, but the Republican's PT average in the state continues to be a healthy +8%. Stay tuned. PollTrack suggests that the debates may be even more important in this election. A poor or stellar performance by one of the contenders or a major gaffe could be the tie breaker (or might confirm underlying perceptions about a candidate and thus swing wavering voters). Or the race could stay close to the end, reflecting the sharp divisions that have polarized the nation in the past four cycles.
Posted Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM by Maurice Berger
With the latest polls in Montana and North Dakota indicating that McCain has taken a comfortable lead, PollTrack moves the state from "Leaning" to "Safe Republican" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM by Maurice Berger
Extrapolating from a series of questions it asked voters to gauge their racial attitudes, a new poll released yesterday reports that support for Obama "would be as much as 6 percentage points higher if there were no white racial prejudice." In other words, Obama would be 6% to 8% ahead of McCain right now if racism were not a factor in this election. According to the the survey--conducted by AP-Yahoo in association with Stanford University--"the
percentage of voters who may turn away from Obama because of his race
could easily be larger than the final difference between the candidates
in 2004 — about two and one-half percentage points." The survey is based, in part, on the following finding: "40 percent of all white Americans hold at least a partly negative view
toward blacks, and that includes many Democrats and independents." The poll's finding may help explain the closeness of the presidential contest at a time when the Republican brand is weak.
Posted Sep 21, 2008 at 3:56 AM by Maurice Berger
On the basis of recent polling in each state, PollTrack moves both South Carolina (Rasmussen: McCain +6%) and West Virginia (Mark Blankenship Enterprises: McCain +5%) from "Safe" to "Leaning Republican" on Today's Map. Both states continue to trend "Safe" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 21, 2008 at 2:15 AM by Maurice Berger
Two new polls issued today show the race in Florida growing tighter: SunSentinel/Research 2000 and Miami Herald/SP Times both indicate a statistical tie with McCain up by +1% and +2% respectively. The MH/SP Times survey suggests that the faltering economy is helping Obama to gain traction in the state. McCain's average lead in the state has now dropped to a just under +3%. A Survey USA poll taken during the same period, continues to report a 6% lead for McCain. PollTrack now moves Florida from "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 21, 2008 at 2:01 AM by Maurice Berger
With Obama's numbers looking strong in Oregon (but not quite at the +10% average mark), PollTrack moves the state on Tomorrow's Map from "Leaning" to "Safe Democrat."
Posted Sep 20, 2008 at 5:14 AM by Maurice Berger
Gallup reports a slight--but only slight--benefit for Obama in the voters' candidate preferences, vis-a-vis the current economic crisis: "Even though Americans divide evenly as to which candidate can better
handle the Wall Street crisis, Barack Obama seems to benefit
politically, as slightly more voters say it increases their likelihood
of voting for him (29%) than say it makes them more likely to vote for
John McCain (23%)"
Posted Sep 20, 2008 at 2:05 AM by Maurice Berger
The two most recent polls issued in Iowa could not be more divergent. Survey USA (one of the more accurate polls during the primaries) gives Obama a whopping 11% lead (54% to 43%). Big10Battleground, a public opinion survey of Midwest voters, reports that the race is tied at 45%. A few more polls may clarify this situation. Statistical glitches or divergent polling models could be to blame. Survey USA shows the race tied among men, for example, numbers that would make Iowa an outlier, since most states report a gender gap (though one smaller than 2004) in which men favor the Republican, women the Democrat. Yet, there is reason to believe that the Democrat may be doing well in Iowa. During the primary and caucus season, Obama spent an inordinate amount of time and money in the state, building a solid organization, good will, and introducing himself to voters. He won the state's caucus by an impressive margin in a hotly contested and highly competitive race. By contrast, McCain lost this first-in-the-nation barometer of party preferences. Until further polling clarifies the situation, PollTrack moves Iowa on Today's Map from "Safe Democrat" to "Leaning Democrat."
Posted Sep 19, 2008 at 5:57 AM by Maurice Berger
In politics, what goes up invariably comes down. Sarah Palin's popularity is no exception. Research 2000 reports a stunning drop in the VP candidate's favorable/unfavorable ratings. According to the survey, 52% of voters last week approved and 35% disapproved of the GOP vice
presidential nominee. This week, her approval rating is at 42%, while 46%
disapprove. Newsweek reports a similar drop: "Over the course of a single weekend . . . Palin
went from being the most popular White House hopeful to the least."
Posted Sep 19, 2008 at 1:48 AM by Maurice Berger
Two new daily trackers just released underscore the closeness of Election 2008. Rasmussen: 48% to 48%. Battleground (the fourth addition to our daily tracking average): 47% to 47%. It couldn't get any closer according to these surveys. One thing to consider: while Obama has made little overall gain in his numerical ceiling since before the conventions (his numbers hovered in the mid-to-high 40s), McCain seems to have made a healthy 3-4% gain that now appears stable. Once stuck in the low 40s, McCain now enjoys a ceiling similar to Obama's, in the mid-to-high 40s.
Posted Sep 19, 2008 at 1:33 AM by Maurice Berger
Yesterday, a rush of statewide surveys resulted in a changed Today's Map. What are the implications of Indiana going from red to gray, Minnesota from blue to gray? One important observation: it looks like the national divisions of 2000 and 2004 are still around. With the exception of usually true-red Indiana (PollTrack still believes the state will eventually trend back to the Republicans), the same swing states are drawning down to a tie. (And, yes, despite the fact that no Democrat has won the state's electoral votes since LBJ in 1964, Virginia is now a swing state: it has actually grown bluer in recent years. Consider the 2006 senate race, where Democrat James Webb defeated Republican George Allen by a mere 8,000 votes.) PollTrack suspects that these divisions may be sharpened by the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two candidates. McCain has been able to solidify the Republican base, take the lion's share of the very dependable (re: voter turnout) 65+ demographic, and appeal to independents. Obama does well with urban voters, young people, African-Americans, and Hispanic voters. The problem for both: they each appeal to the same constituent demographics as Gore and Bush, Bush and Kerry, leaving a slim pool of swing voters (married suburban women, for example) to essentially break the tie. PollTrack suggests that other factors--preeminently Obama's race, women disaffected by the Obama campaign's handling of Hillary Clinton, McCain's age, and Palin's religious conservatism--are making it difficult for either candidate to eat into the other's base or to pick off large segments of independent and unaffiliated voters.
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 10:40 AM by Maurice Berger
Three recent polls indicate a dramatic tightening of the race in Minnesota. It's so close at this point--Obama leads by little more than 1% on average--that PollTrack moves the state back from "Leaning Democrat" to 'Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 10:30 AM by Maurice Berger
The race is getting closer in Ohio. Could McCain's slip up on Monday hurt him in a state where many voters are hurting due to the failing economy? PollTrack moves Ohio From "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 10:25 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has just looked over 30 statewide and national polls released today. The race is definitely drawing closer in many states and in the nation as a whole. A new call: Indiana moves from "Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 3:37 AM by Maurice Berger
One more important bit of information inside the numbers of the CBS News/New York Times survey released late last night: the volatility of the race: "Roughly twenty percent of both McCain
and Obama supporters say they have not yet settled definitively on their chosen
candidate." The next significant opportunity to bring some stability to the numbers (save a major league gaffe): the debates.
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 2:58 AM by Maurice Berger
It looks like the race could stay a tie. A new Battleground Tracking poll released this morning continues to show McCain in the lead, 47% to 45%. And the question of the economy may not help Obama break the tie, given the concern of many voters about the Democrat's perceived lack of experience or specific programs. Today, a Rasmussen national survey reports: "Neither presidential candidate has convinced a majority of voters that they know
how to handle the country's growing economic crisis, according to a new
Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 24% say it's Very Likely that
Barack Obama will bring the kind of change that is needed to Wall Street."
Posted Sep 18, 2008 at 1:42 AM by Maurice Berger
As of this morning, PollTrack's reading of national periodic and daily tracking surveys issued over the past few days suggests
that momentum has swung back to Obama. A CBS News/New YorkTimes survey
issued last night, for example, gives the Democrat +5% among likely voters: 49%
to 44%. A Quinnipiac national
poll released this morning reports a similar lead for Obama: 49% to
45%. And yesterday's daily trackers (save Rasmussen, which gave McCain
an insignificant 1% lead, but today shows the race tied at 48%)
reported Obama running slightly ahead of his Republican rival. How
significant is this swing? PollTrack observes
that Obama's numbers have improved in both national and some statewide
samples taken just in the past few days. These samples may reflect
public discontent or anxiety about McCain's much publicized remark om
Monday that the "fundamentals of the economy are strong," a comment
followed by increasingly devastating economic news. The CBS/NYT survey points out, for
example, that the 61% of voters who believe the economy is getting
worse are now "heavily for Obama." Can the Obama campaign succeed in
painting McCain as out of touch on the economy? If so, the candidate
may be able to increase his lead beyond the statistical tie of recent
weeks. Right now--and as it has been for weeks--the race remains a
statistical tie (PollTrack's national average yesterday: 45.7% to
45.7%) with the lead in flux, depending on the direction of female
and independent voters.
Posted Sep 17, 2008 at 8:59 AM by Maurice Berger
With recent numbers indicating improving numbers for Obama in the state (particularly among Hispanic voters), PollTrack moves New Mexico from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Democrat" on both Today's and Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 17, 2008 at 8:46 AM by Maurice Berger
Due to the dramatic narrowing of the polls in Wisconsin and the extreme closeness of the margins of victory in the last two presidential cycles, PollTrack moves the state on Today's Map from "Leaning Democratic" to "Too Close To Call"
Posted Sep 17, 2008 at 5:11 AM by Maurice Berger
Back during the primaries, Obama partisans and surrogates touted the idea that their candidate's popularity was so broad and deep that he would flip Republican voters (into so-called "Obamicans") and get the lion's share of independents in November. During the primaries, his campaign did capture its share of crossover voters, including a modest number of Republicans. What a difference five months makes. Now, the picture is quite different: with Republicans firmly in McCain's grasp and independents leaning his way, the electoral map is much as it was in 2004. During the primaries, pundits talked about Obama redrawing the electoral map by winning in traditional Republican strongholds in November (such as Kansas, the Dakotas, Georgia, and North Carolina). As PollTrack has noted before, this is not panning out. Further proof that both camps are relying on the same limited field of battleground and swing states comes this morning from the Wisconsin Advertising Project: "Despite much talk about an expanded playing field, by and large, states
receiving advertising in 2008 look similar to the states targeted in
the 2004 presidential campaign. The Obama campaign aired ads in
seventeen states from September 6-13, while the McCain campaign aired
ads in fifteen of those same states."
Posted Sep 17, 2008 at 1:17 AM by Maurice Berger
What's going in New Jersey? Two new polls--Quinnipiac and Marist--show the race drawing close, with Obama holding a modest 3% lead: 48% to 45%. Two additional polls report Obama with a lead virtually unchanged from a month ago, at +8-9% (Monmouth and Research 2000). Three important points:  there is little disagreement in Obama's numbers across the four polls--he touches or just grazes the 50% mark in each.  McCain's numbers have improved across the surveys from a month ago (due to white undecided voters breaking his away according to several polls)  The narrowing of the race actually fits an historical pattern in New Jersey: Republican presidential candidates often see their numbers inch up in September/October only to see this improvement evaporate by Election Day. With no real shift in Obama's base numbers in the state, PollTrack continues to call New Jersey "Leaning Democrat" on Today's and Tomorrow's maps.
Posted Sep 16, 2008 at 6:54 AM by Maurice Berger
Our averaging of the three daily tracking polls--Hotline/FD, Rasmussen, and Gallup--today puts Obama back into the lead, by an insignificant 0.7%. The latter two polls actually continue to report a lead for McCain (+1%), but Hotline calls it +4 Obama. It's worth noting that Hotline has proven the most erratic of the three pollsters, trading leads on an almost day to day basis. Is the momentum turning every so slightly back to the Democrat? PollTrack's averaging of periodic and daily national polls continues to give McCain a small lead: +1.3%. Stay tuned for tomorrow's numbers, especially for Rasmussen and Gallup.
Posted Sep 16, 2008 at 2:44 AM by Maurice Berger
On the experience question, Rasmussen reports (9/15) the following numbers: "Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters say John McCain is prepared right now
to be president, and 50% say the same thing about Democratic vice presidential
candidate Joseph Biden. Forty-four percent (44%) say the man at the top of
Biden's ticket, Barack Obama, is ready, but 45% say he isn’t." On Mccain's running mate: "Over half of voters (52%) say McCain’s running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah
Palin, is not prepared to be president, but 33% disagree"
Posted Sep 16, 2008 at 1:13 AM by Maurice Berger
Will the Wall Street crisis, high gas prices, and the struggling economy automatically help the Democrats? Not necessarily. Public opinion on the campaigns' approach to economic issues is split, with Obama ahead when the question is more general (who would best handle the economy, who best understands your economic concerns), but sometimes breaks for McCain when questions are more specific (who would better handle the deficit, who do you trust to negotiate trade agreements, who do you trust to balance the federal budget). This pattern, of course, may change if events on the ground become dire or begin to have an immediate impact on voters. But consider this: a candidate's experience also matters when voters are feeling anxious. And in this regard, McCain has a considerable edge in public opinion surveys on the question of who has the adequate experience to be president. In times of war or economic crisis, voters often turn to the candidate who in their eyes best represents stability or measured change, rather than dynamic change.
Posted Sep 15, 2008 at 7:43 AM by Maurice Berger
With Survey USA showing Obama up by 4% in Virginia and Siena reporting today that the Democrat's once commanding lead in New York has shrunk to 5%, it's time to take a deep breath. Both polls contradict most other surveys in the two states. PollTrack suspects that statistical irregularities, conflicting models, and margins of error are only part of the problem. Also in play: voter attitudes are in flux. After Labor Day the electorate traditionally begins to pay attention. Yet, never before have voters been bombarded with more and more varied news sources--from broadcast TV and cable news and newspapers to myriad political and news websites and news magazines. Like the polls, voter sentiment itself may be volatile because news cycles now turn over in a matters of hours rather than days or even weeks.
Posted Sep 15, 2008 at 1:51 AM by Maurice Berger
Based on statewide polling over the past month, PollTrack has a number of new calls on Election Day Map Today. In the coming weeks--as trends are established and voter opinion appears to be solidifying--more states will be added to the final tally. Stay tuned . . .
Posted Sep 15, 2008 at 1:35 AM by Maurice Berger
Although the Republican base is fired up and McCain claims a significant lead among independents, Democratic party identification and voter enthusiasm is also way up (Rasmussen gives the Democrats a 5% advantage). Thus, neither candidate is walking away with the election at this point. Even a cursory glance at the electoral map suggests conditions far similar to the razor close count of 2000 and not 1988 or 1992, where one party gained lasting momentum and was able to pick off enough swing states to capture a solid electoral majority. If Obama were poised to do this, he would need to win a bunch of states that have gone Republican in the last two cycles but were also won by Bill Clinton in 1992 and/or 1996: Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, Montana, Georgia, Florida. All these states are now moving solidly into the Republican column. Similarly, McCain is behind in New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Michigan (though by smaller margins than Obama in TN, KY, MN, GA, WV), states he would need for a big win.
Unless dramatic on-the-ground events (perhaps spurred by this weekend's Wall Street meltdown) or a striking under-performance or major league blooper in the debates throws off one of the candidates, it's conceivable that the election will remain close to the very end. Then it will be up to voter enthusiasm and turnout to propel one or the other over the victory line.
Posted Sep 14, 2008 at 5:02 AM by Maurice Berger
Since the late-1960s, Minnesota has trended Democratic in presidential elections. Indeed, since 1968, MN has gone to the Democrat all but once (in 1972). In recent years, however, the state has been trending red, with one senate seat and the governorship now Republican. Indeed, MN was almost evenly divided in the 2000 and 2004 presidential cycles. Thus, it should not be surprising that two polls released in the past 24 hours--by the Minnesota Star Tribune and Survey USA--show the race a statical dead heat, with the two candidates tied in the former (at 45%), and Obama ahead by a statistically insignificant 2% in the latter. A few weeks ago, a CNN survey had Obama leading by 12%. PollTrack now calls the race "To Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map and keeps it "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 14, 2008 at 1:42 AM by Maurice Berger
Good news for the Obama campaign in Iowa, the state that started it all for the candidate back in January: a new poll released by the Des Moines Register, the only survey to correctly predict Obama's surge in the days leading up to the Iowa Caucus, reports that the Democrat has taken a commanding 12% lead in the state. This combined with a recent CNN poll suggest that Obama is doing very well in Iowa. PollTrack moves Iowa from "Leaning" to "Safe Democrat" on Today's Map Today.
Posted Sep 14, 2008 at 1:28 AM by Maurice Berger
A new Rasmussen Daily Tracker released this morning suggests that McCain has hit an important milestone: for the first time since Obama wrapped up the Democratic nomination last spring, McCain has touched the heretofore elusive 50% mark in voter support. Will it last? It certainly has proved elusive for Obama who has not been able to sustain support at this level for more than a day or two. What may be more troubling for the Obama campaign are the implications of the sophisticated and complex model employed by Rasmussen for determining voter enthusiasm and predicting voter turnout. Their model now gives the Democrats a significant 5% advantage. Despite this, McCain has held a 3% lead over the past three days, this morning inching up to the 50% mark.
Posted Sep 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM by Maurice Berger
The Palin nomination and the RNC seem to have greatly improved McCain's standing in some western, Rocky Mountain, and plains states. PollTrack moves South Dakota from "Leaning" to "Safe Republican on Today's Map Today (as well as on Tomorrow's Map).
Posted Sep 13, 2008 at 2:03 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has received a number of E-mails from Democrats concerned about Obama's chances in November. The short answer: no candidate is decisively ahead and the race is fairly even both in national support and electoral votes. It is clear that McCain came out of his convention stronger than Obama. It is also true that the momentum is now with the Republican. But the race is close enough that either candidate can win. By contrast, President Bush came out of his convention in 2004 with a sizable bounce that he maintained throughout much of September. Strong debate performances by Sen. John Kerry allowed the Democrat to narrow the gap considerably, though not entirely close it.
PollTrack suspects that the debates will be an important factor in this election. Since 1960 in presidential races in which debates were held (1960, 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004), the debates were usually decisive. Indeed in contested cycles, where an incumbent did not sail to victory--races that include all but 1984 and 1996--the debates were the decisive factor in most instances. Here are a few debate bloopers and successes that really made a difference: Nixon's listless appearance and five-o'clock shadow in 1960; Ford's gaffe about Poland in 1976; Dukakis' cold and dispassionate response to a question about whether his liberal views about crime and punishment would be shaken if his own wife were raped; Reagan's ability to convince a skeptical nation that he was not an extremist in 1980; and George H. W. Bush caught on camera glancing at his watch while his opponent, Bill Clinton, was addressing dire economic issues in 1992.
In the short term: watch to see if McCain's bounce translates into improvement in the statewide contest for electoral votes. Right now, the answer is a mixed bag: McCain appears to be benefiting form a sizable bounce in Southern states and smaller but marked improvement in number of western, plains and Rocky Mountain states. Obama's numbers remain very strong in New England (save New Hampshire). Numbers for the mid-west, rust belt, and mid-Atlantic states are unclear at this point, though Obama appears to be loosing a little ground in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. New York and California seem solidly behind the Democrat.
Posted Sep 12, 2008 at 11:45 AM by Maurice Berger
A Marist survey released this evening suggests that the race in New Jersey may be drawing closer. A month ago, Quinnipiac reported a 10% lead for the Democrat. Marist now shows a 3% difference, 48% to 45%, among likely voters. An averaging of the latest polls in the state gives Obama a 4.5% advantage. PollTrack continues to call the state "Leaning Democrat."
Posted Sep 12, 2008 at 7:18 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has just perused a bunch of national periodic and daily tracking polls released today. The conclusion: the race is very close, with McCain holding onto a 2% to 3% aggregate lead. Another conclusion: McCain 's bounce may have solidified to a certain extent. Obama's bounce, on the other hand, appears to have been blunted, then erased, followed as it was by the VP announcement and the Republican convention a few hours later.
Posted Sep 12, 2008 at 3:39 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack has had a chance to digest six polls released over the past few days for the key battleground state of Ohio. It appears that the Quinnipiac survey (which showed Obama up by five) is an "outlier"--a poll that lies dramatically apart from the rest (the other polls give McCain the advantage, from +1 to + 7%, with an average of +4%). It appears that the momentum in Ohio is moving in McCain's direction. This PollTrack moves Ohio on Tomorrow's Map from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Republican."
Posted Sep 12, 2008 at 1:30 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack observes that the so-called 50-state strategy of the Obama campaign--the idea that the electoral map can be realigned to flip into the Democratic column traditional Republican strongholds such Alaska, the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas, Montana, North Carolina, Georgia, and Virginia--may not be working. With the Republican party unified--and Sarah Palin firing up the party's most faithful voters--most of these states are now out of reach. Over the past week, McCain's numbers are improved dramatically in these states, in some cases tilting them into the "Safe" column (indeed all of the above states, save VA, where McCain has moved into a tiny lead, are growing redder). Is the Obama campaign squandering its resources in states it cannot win, thus diluting its power in states that have traditionally been close but winnable for the Democrats?
The good news for Obama--but one that brings the 50-state strategy into question--is that the candidate is holding his own in nearly all of the states that John Kerry won in 2004, leading in many by significant margins. Still, in order to reach the magic number of 270, Obama will need to pick off a few states that either are inevitably Republican (but have shifting demographics that favor the Democrats, like VA, which has gone red in every presidential cycle since 1964) or have a demographic that gives the Dems a fighting chance to flip the state (CO, NV, NM, FL). Will competing in states that are not winnable make it more difficult for the Obama campaign to pick off states that are?
Posted Sep 11, 2008 at 2:01 PM by Maurice Berger
On the heels of Palin's nomination and the RNC, North Carolina--once a state the Obama campaign believed it could pick off from the Republicans--is moving in McCain's direction. While it remains "Leaning Republican" on Today's Map, the trend toward red pushes it to "Safe Republican" on Tomorrow's Map.
Posted Sep 11, 2008 at 5:42 AM by Maurice Berger
Intrade, the preeminent online "prediction market"--where online bidders place bets on the outcome of forthcoming political, social, and cultural events--has some troubling news for the Obama campaign: McCain has for the first time moved ahead of his Democratic rival on the question of who will win in November. While this number is not in and of itself meaningful, it suggests one implicit problem for the Democrats: the perception, in the minds of many voters, that an Obama victory is no longer inevitable. (See below, "Most Americans Now Think McCain, Not Obama, Will Win," 8 September.)
Posted Sep 11, 2008 at 3:29 AM by Maurice Berger
Georgia was one state the Obama campaign believed it could pick off from the Republicans through a marked increase in African American voter enthusiasm and statewide support for Libertarian candidate and native-son Bob Barr. It looks like Obama's strategy is not paying off, with several polls in the state showing a widening lead for McCain. PollTrack moves Georgia from "Leaning" "to "Safe Repubican" on Today's Map.
Posted Sep 11, 2008 at 1:46 AM by Maurice Berger
With three new polls all showing the race in Pennsylvania drawing down to a statistical tie--Obama now leads by an average of just over 2%--PollTrack moves the state on Today's Map from "Leaning Democrat" to "Too Close to Call." It is quite possible that the RNC and Palin are helping McCain in the more conservative middle section of the state--an area rich in small towns, Evangelical and Christian conservative voters, and gun owners. In many ways, the state's population is closely divided, with more liberal cities such as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh anchoring its Democratic base and small cities and towns in the middle trending Republican. Often, it comes down to turnout in these areas as well as how the vote breaks down in the suburbs of the larger cities, a demographic that has been somewhat fluid in previous elections.
Posted Sep 11, 2008 at 1:38 AM by Maurice Berger
Two polls show released over the past few days by Quinnipiac University and CNN/Time show Obama ahead in Ohio (by 5% or 2%, respectively); Fox/Rasmussen, on the other hand, gives McCain a lead of 7%. These results suggest that voter models and markers for voter enthusiasm--or even perhaps discrepancies in data collection--are producing divergent conclusion about this mother of all battleground states. The averaging of these survey results results is a dead heat: 46.7% to 46.7%. As a result, PollTrack now moves Ohio from"Leaning Republican" to "Too Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map Today.
Posted Sep 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM by Maurice Berger
New polling in North Dakota suggests that the state, now "Leaning Republican," is clearly trending Republican. So PollTrack moves North Dakota on Tomorrow's Map from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Republican." It appears that the Republican ticket--now decidedly Western in its make up--is seeing improving numbers in western, Rocky Mountain, and plains states, from New Mexico up through Montana and the Dakotas.
Posted Sep 10, 2008 at 9:03 AM by Maurice Berger
A new CNN/Time poll shows a marked improvement for Obama in New Hampshire--bringing the state more into line with the rest of New England, the region with some of the Democrat's strongest numbers. PollTrack continues to call the state "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map. But it appears to be trending Obama's way. Thus, New Hampshire moves to "Leaning Democrat" on Tomorrow's Map Today.
Posted Sep 10, 2008 at 6:42 AM by Maurice Berger
Echoing a host of polls taken since the Republican National Convention concluded last week, a Fox News survey released this afternoon reports a "substantial shift in the vote preference. . . . Independents now break for McCain by 15
percentage points, 46% to 31%." A month ago, Obama had a 1% lead among independents. The poll gives McCain an overall advantage of 3%: 45% to 42%. Significantly for both camps, it registers a large block of undecided voters, suggesting that this election is very much up for grabs.
Posted Sep 10, 2008 at 5:41 AM by Maurice Berger
New polling over the past few days suggests that the race may be tightening in Pennsylvania. PollTrack continues to rate PA "Leaning Democrat" on Today's Map. But, for now, Pennsylvania moves from "leaning Democrat" to "To Close To Call" on Tomorrow's Map, suggesting possible momentum towards McCain in this key battleground state.
Posted Sep 10, 2008 at 1:45 AM by Maurice Berger
A new NBC/Wall Street Journal survey out yesterday indicates that both candidate's favorable ratings are up, higher than those for Bush and Kerry in 2004. This suggests that both candidates have fired up their respective bases (plus a good number of independents as well). Conclusion: the election remains a statistical tie, with neither candidate pulling significantly ahead of the other.
The Palin Effect continues to improve McCain's standing. The same poll reports an alarming decline in white female support for the Democrat as well as a significant drop in female support overall. The survey observes: "In last month's NBC/WSJ poll, Obama was leading McCain by 14 points among female
voters; now that lead is just four points. Moreover, Obama was up by 20 points
in August among women ages 18-49; now McCain is ahead by three points. And last
month, Obama held a one-point lead among white women; now McCain is up among
them by 10 points."
But will this continue? It's hard to say. Palin is the least vetted of the four candidates on the respective Democratic and Republican tickets. On the other hand, she has tapped into and ignited a demographic crucial to winning in November and heretofore skittish about Obama: married white women (especially in small towns, rural areas, and some suburban districts). These voters tend to skew more conservative than single women and they tend to vote much more reliably. By activating voter enthusiasm among Evangelicals, Christian conservatives AND a significant swath of the female demographic, Palin, for now, helps give McCain a slight edge. But for how long?
Posted Sep 09, 2008 at 8:21 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack just had a sneak preview of new polling numbers from Montana. It appears that the RNC and Sarah Palin are, at least for now, significantly improving McCain's numbers in a state that usually votes Republican in presidential cycles (though Bill clinton won the state in 1992, in part because independent candidate Ross Perot siphoned off a considerable number of Republican and libertarian voters unhappy with incumbent George H. W. Bush but unwilling to support the Democrat).
PollTrack now moves Montana from "Too Close To Call" to "Leaning Republican"
Posted Sep 09, 2008 at 5:49 AM by Maurice Berger
In an observation with possibly serious implications for the Obama campaign, Gallup now reports that independent voters have shifted dramatically towards McCain. He now holds a 15% advantage with these voters according to Gallup.
Palin has helped McCain consolidate the Republican base. The question, if Gallup is correct: Why are independents moving in the Republican's direction?
I another poll released today, Public Policy Polling (PPP) reports that McCain has a statistically significant lead in Florida: 50% to 45%. (PollTrack continue to call the state "Leaning Republican."). In a telling detail--which tends to confirm Gallup's results-- undecided or unaffiliated white voters are now almost all breaking for McCain. Over the past few months, McCain's share of these voters in Florida has gone from 53% to 55% to 61%
Posted Sep 09, 2008 at 4:07 AM by Maurice Berger
Over the next two months, PollTrack's polling analysis will rely on hundreds of national and statewide public opinion surveys. The following is a partial list of PollTrack's data sources. The list includes polling organizations as well as surveys commissioned by local and national media outlets:
ABC News/Washington Post
Associated Press/Yahoo News
CBS News/New York Times
Columbus Dispatch (Ohio)
Des Moines Register
Deseret News (Utah)
Detroit Free Press
Florida Chamber of Commerce
Fox News/Opinion Dynamics
Franklin and Marshall
Greg Smith & Associates
Ivan Moore Research
Mark Blankenship Enterprises (WV)
Marketing Resource Group of Lansing (MI)
Miami Herald/SP Times
Minnesota Public Radio
Morning Call/Muhlenberg College (PA)
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
North Dakota UTU
Ohio Newspaper Poll
Portland Tribune Poll (Oregon)
Public Policy Polling (PPD)
Quad City Times/R2000
Reno-Gazette Journal (Nevada)
Rocky Mountain News/CBS4
Star Tribune (Minnesota)
University of Cincinnati
University of Iowa
University of New Hampshire
University of Texas
Posted Sep 09, 2008 at 1:49 AM by Maurice Berger
Looking at the bulk of national polling completed entirely after the Republican National Convention, PollTrack now sees the race as statistically tied but trending in McCain's direction. It appears that the RNC was successful in erasing Obama's "bounce," increasing voter party identification for the Republicans, and improving McCain's numbers in a range of categories, from his potential as leader and commander in chief to his handling of Iraq and the economy.
The thing to watch: state polls. Are national numbers translated into an improved performance for McCain in battleground states? The earliest signs suggest an up tick in support for McCain in some of these states.
Another thing to watch: the media's vetting of Palin. Will the luster wear-off her candidacy? If so, will races that now favor McCain--Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Missouri, all states with significant Evangelical populations--become closer?
Posted Sep 08, 2008 at 11:14 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack observes that the race in Washington state appears to be tightening, not surprising given the closeness of statewide races in recent years. The last race for governor ended in weeks of recounts, with a few hundred votes separating the candidates at one point. A US Senate race in 2000 was also astonishing close. (That year, a recount was ordered in the US Senate race when the eventual winner Democrat Maria Cantwell held a
1,953-vote lead over Republican Sen. Slade Gorton.)
PollTrack moves Washington from "Safe Democrat" to "Leaning Democrat"
Posted Sep 08, 2008 at 5:40 AM by Maurice Berger
A new Public Policy Polling survey released today indicates a close race in Michigan, with Obama leading by 1%--47% to 46%. This poll alone would not have caused PollTrack to reevaluate the Michigan race. The problem for Democrats: their relatively poor performance with women in this survey (he now has only a 3% lead) and others. Over the past five presidential cycles, the Democrats' lead among women in Michigan and other states in the region has been considerable higher. The PPP survey also indicates that Palin seems to be a hit with Michigan voters, with "45% of respondents say they are more likely to vote for McCain because of his running mate selection."
Thus PollTrack moves Michigan from "Leaning Democratic" to "Too Close To Call" on Today's Map Today.
Posted Sep 08, 2008 at 4:42 AM by Maurice Berger
Two new polls suggest that the presidential numbers, rather than a plus for either candidate, have to returned to the dead heat recorded before conventions. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll reports a 48% to 48% split, with no "bounce" for either candidate and a surprisingly small pool of undecided voters. Similarly, a Hotline/FD daily tracking poll (which commenced on Friday and will be added to our daily tracking average), shows the race tied at 44%, but with a larger number of undecideds.
The next few days may help sort things out.
Posted Sep 08, 2008 at 1:52 AM by Maurice Berger
A new USA Today/Gallup Poll released this morning (this is a periodic survey, not a daily tracker), suggests a dramatic turnaround for the McCain campaign: when the poll's filter was narrowed to include only those most likely to vote in November, McCain's lead is now at an astonishing +10% and well over the 50% mark, at 54% to 44%. With all registered voter, McCain's lead shrinks to 4%, 50% to 46%.
The "likely voter" number may be an anomaly. By using earlier voter models, thus underestimating turnout for the 18-29 year-old vote demographic, for example, the poll may skew the numbers in McCain's direction (earlier models would favor turnout among the +65 set, a demographic with a consistently high turnout, the age group most likely to vote for McCain according to previous surveys).
Nevertheless, pollsters are fairly adept at determining voter enthusiasm, a key factor in turnout. Since Obama's primary and caucus winning streak in February, enthusiasm among younger voters appears to have dropped considerably according to a number of surveys. In 1972, support for the anti-war candidate, Senator George McGovern (DEM-SD) was extremely high among young voters during the primary season. By election day, their support failed to translate into votes and Nixon won by a landslide. Younger voters are notoriously unreliable on Election Day, as are single women, another demographic now trending towards Obama.
Overall, PollTrack has noticed a marked improvement in McCain's numbers in surveys released in the wake of the Republican National Convention. The answers to a broad range of questions about the relative merits of the two candidates in the Survey USA poll released yesterday (see below)--a survey that suggests that more voters now believe McCain, and not Obama will win in November--indicates a clear increase in voter confidence for the Republican over the Democrat in virtually every category, including handling the Iraq war and foreign policy, commander in chief credentials, and even on the economy (Obama still wins on this one, but by a smaller number than earlier surveys).
Posted Sep 07, 2008 at 4:30 PM by Maurice Berger
A new Survey USA poll taken after the Republican National Convention reports that more Americans now think McCain, and not Obama, will win in November. McCain leads Obama, 49% to 44%, among respondents who were
asked "if you were placing a bet today" who do you think will be elected
president? In recent months, most public opinion surveys have indicated that voters believed Obama would win.
If this trend holds, it could prove problematic for Obama, especially at a time when the Republican brand is on the wane and a Democratic win had seemed likely to many voters.
Posted Sep 07, 2008 at 5:12 AM by Maurice Berger
An average of Daily Tracking Polls, now indicates that McCain has moved into the lead. Indeed, the Gallup tracker just released shows McCain with a 3% advantage--48% to 45%. PollTrack's daily average gives McCain a 1.5% lead overall. McCain has heretofore not been able to hold any statistical lead for more than a few days during the past two months.
If his lead holds, McCain's post-convention "bounce" may be steeper than Obama's (right now indicating an 8% up tick for the Republicans since the height of the Democratic "bounce" at roughly 4% to 5%). Does the fact that the Republicans went last also give them a long term advantage, allowing their gains to solidify? Time will tell.
Posted Sep 07, 2008 at 2:04 AM by Maurice Berger
With National periodic and daily tracking polls now reporting the race a tie (Rasumssen this morning: 48% to 48%) and both candidates appearing to inch up over the 45% level, are we in for a nail biter of a campaign?
The answer would appear to be yes. In 2006, the Democrats took back both houses of congress in a political environment that was even worse for the Republicans than it is today. Yet, the national race remained very close. Indeed, the Democrats took back the Senate by winning two highly contested elections-- Montana, and Virginia--by 3,000 and 8,000 votes respectively out of millions cast. In other words, the nation was and remains fairly evenly divided.
Conventional wisdom suggests that Obama should be way ahead right now--given voters generally negative view of the Republican brand. Yet, sharp divisions within the electorate suggest that both parties are evenly divided in support, with each maintaining a base of about 40%. This leaves independents, unaffiliated, and undecided voters to make up the difference. And these voters, too, appear to be wavering and divided. After the DNC, many independents shifted towards Obama. Now they are moving back to McCain. With the Democratic and Republican bases now firmly in place, it is this shift that will account for each candidate's lead (or lack thereof) in the coming weeks.
These conditions are not that different from the last three presidential and national cycles. Indeed, the grand national realignment that the Obama campaign touted several months ago--in which Democrats maintained they would be competitive in tradition Republican strongholds such as the Dakotas, North Carolina, Georgia, Indiana, Nebraska, and Kansas--does not appear to be materializing. McCain is now leading in all of these states (by significant margins in some, and with only North Dakota possibly in play), in good part because he has solidified the Republican base and fired up Evangelicals and Christian conservatives.
Right now we're back to an electoral map that appears similar to 2000 and 2004--with just a few extra swing states thrown in (Colorado, Virginia, and New Hampshire being the most volatile right now).
A nail biter, indeed.
Posted Sep 06, 2008 at 5:18 AM by Maurice Berger
Today's Gallup Daily Tracking Poll, like Rasmussen, concludes that Obama's "bounce" has vanished in the wake of the Republican National Convention. Gallup now now calls the race "Too-Close-To Call," with Obama's 8% advantage dwindling to 2%, 47% to 45%.
Posted Sep 06, 2008 at 1:57 AM by Maurice Berger
It looks like the timing of the conventions--virtually back-to-back--as well as the relative success of the Republican National Convention in communicating its message to voters may have significantly blunted the 5% "bounce" that Obama received coming out of his convention. The two daily trackers--Rasmussen and Gallup--both show a renewed tightening of the race, with numbers falling back to a point or so of where they were before the start of either convention. This morning, Rasmussen shows Obama with a 3% lead: 49% to 46%.
There is a good news for both candidates in Rasmussen's numbers. For Obama, it's the candidate's proximity to 50%. Obama appears to maintain a base number in the upper forties, McCain in the mid to lower-forties. The big question: will McCain's convention produce more than a tradition "bounce" of 4-5%. If so, his numbers could inch up towards the magic number of 50%. Right now, it appears that the race has returned to its pre-convention status, with fluid numbers, Obama above 45%, McCain slightly below, and both candidates very close.
As for the McCain campaign, Rasmussen suggests that Obama's lead among women has dropped by 50% over the past five days, down to 7% from a lead of 14% after the Democratic National Convention. The jury is still out on whether Palin has improved McCain's standing among women. But one thing is certain: all too often the pundits have reduced the "female vote" to a rigid stereotype, one that implies that most women are pro-choice, anti-gun, and feminist. Yet in many swing states--including PA, OH, MI, WI--large blocs of female voters, especially working class and/or married women, trend conservative in their cultural and social beliefs. Could this demographic account for McCain's improving numbers among female voters?
Posted Sep 05, 2008 at 8:18 AM by Maurice Berger
More viewers tuned into John McCain's acceptance speech last night than Obama's a week ago. And more than 13 million more people watched Palin's speech than Biden's. Here are the final Nielsen numbers for all four events:
McCain: 38.9 million
Obama: 38.4 million
Palin: 37.2 million
Biden: 24.0 million
As for gender: more women tuned into Obama's speech; more men for McCain's.
Posted Sep 05, 2008 at 5:20 AM by Maurice Berger
PollTrack's average of today's daily trackers has dropped back to +3% Obama, a point or so shy of where it was at the start of the Democratic convention (and from a high of +7 DEM earlier in the week). Obama now leads McCain, 48% to 45%. The bulk of these surveys, which represent a rolling average of the preceding three or four days, was taken before McCain's speech last night.
If this trend continues, it will underscore the extent to which the back-to-back conventions may have canceled each other's "bounce."
In other polling news, Rasmussen has just released a poll reporting that Sarah Palin is now viewed favorably by 58% of voters. Perhaps more surprising is the rapid rise of her popularity: according to Rasmussen, her favorable rating is now higher than either McCain's or Obama's.
Posted Sep 05, 2008 at 1:45 AM by Maurice Berger
Rasmussen's latest daily tracker would seem to confirm the conclusion of the CBS News poll released late last night: the race is tightening back to at least a statistical tie. Rasmussen Reports indicates a 3% point drop for Obama over the past two days (with most of this sample taken before McCain's speech). Obama now leads in this survey, 48% to 46%.
Early results from the week also suggest that Sarah Palin and her speech were well received by voters. PollTrack will have more detailed results later today and tomorrow.
The jury is still out on the question of McCain's "bounce" as well as the potential of back to back conventions to cancel out gains made by either party (or by the first convention). PollTrack will have a better sense of this next week (but clues will roll out over the next few days, as they have in the Rasmussen and CBS surveys, as voters begin to digest the messages of both conventions)
Posted Sep 04, 2008 at 11:39 AM by Maurice Berger
A newly released CBS News poll reports that the race for the White House is now a tie--42% to 42%--with Obama dropping 6% and McCain gaining 2% since its last opinion survey taken last weekend, just after the Democratic National Convention.
A trend? A statistical anomaly? Stay Turned.
Posted Sep 04, 2008 at 1:46 AM by Maurice Berger
Rasmussen's Daily Tracker released this morning reports that
this is "the second straight day that the results have inched very
slightly in McCain’s direction as the GOP convention gets underway and seeks to
overcome Obama's convention bounce" Are we seeing the start of McCain's
convention bounce, even before McCain's speech and the effects of Palin's
dramatic speech set in with voters?
In another positive sign for the Republicans, only 42% of
Independents believe Obama is more qualified than Palin to be president. And by
a margin of ten to one, Rasmussen reports that voters believe that
"journalists are trying to hurt Palin's campaign rather than help."
The Republican's adept anti-media rhetoric may indeed be working.
Posted Sep 03, 2008 at 4:59 PM by Maurice Berger
Palin's speech--both a blistering attack on Obama and an emotional appeal to
small town, middle-American values--no doubt fired up the Republican base. It,
also, no doubt fired up the Democratic base.
The dueling bases each hover around 40%, leaving a large bloc of
independent, undecided (including many Reagan Democrats and a smaller number of moderate Republicans), or unaffiliated voters. Thus, the key demographic to
watch--one that will determine the height and depth of McCain's post convention
"bounce"--are these voters. Obama has seen a modest up tick in
support from these voters in his post convention numbers.
Is this the result of a successful convention, one that delivered the
candidate's message effectively and helped build trust among unaffiliated
Or are these voters reacting to Palin, whose hard right politics and religious
fundamentalism edge her towards the political extreme rather than the center? Has the hint of scandals turned off voters who now suspect that McCain—a
candidate whose major selling point is his bold and clear-headed judgment—exercised
poor judgment or even political expediency during the vetting process?
Can one commanding speech alter this dynamic? And, perhaps most important, will
the choice of running mates in this election, as in most presidential cycles, have little effect on the outcome?
Posted Sep 03, 2008 at 9:19 AM by Maurice Berger
Based on polling over the past week, PollTrack moves Minnesota, a key swing state, from "To-Close-To-Call" to "Leaning Democrat."
Posted Sep 03, 2008 at 1:04 AM by Maurice Berger
The other problem for the Democrats is the rapid fire timing of
McCain's announcement of his running mate in the hours after Obama's
speech, a move justified by a party whose convention was just days
away. While the jury is still out about whether Palin improves McCain's
support among women--though conservative women do seem to be warming to
the nominee--one thing is certain: Palin has dramatically improved
McCain's standing with religious conservatives and Evangelical
Christians, the base of his party. The enthusiasm among these voters--a
bloc that heretofore has been slow to support or trust McCain--is
extremely high at the moment. The announcement resulted in an almost
instantaneous rush of cash into Republican coffers, igniting "a wave of elation and emotion that has led some grassroots activists to
weep with joy."
The intensity level among these voters matters a lot for the
Republicans. Evangelical Christians, for example, are among the most
reliable voters (along with the 65+ set, now also leaning McCain's
way). In 2004, a close election as this one may well be, these voters
came out in exceedingly high numbers, thus assuring President Bush's
How Palin does tonight--in a much anticipated speech, her
introduction to the nation--may well determine if voter enthusiasm for
Palin extends beyond these religious conservative voters.
Posted Sep 03, 2008 at 1:02 AM by Maurice Berger
A slew of polls released over the past 48 hours report good news for Obama: a 4% -5% "bounce" nationally over surveys conducted before the Democratic National Convention. While this represents an average post-convention bounce, several of the polls report another milestone for the Democrat--he's broken the 50% mark.
Yet, PollTrack wonders: how durable will these numbers be given the odd timing of the conventions. In most presidential cycles, the three to four week lag between events gives voters time to digest the convention and its messages and get to know the candidate even better, all before the other party has its turn.
Posted Sep 02, 2008 at 1:30 AM by Maurice Berger
A new poll issued today by CBS News suggests that Obama received a modest "bounce" out of his convention. According to the poll, he now leads 48% to 40%, up five points from their last survey a few weeks ago. These numbers, of course, conflict with CNN/Opinion Research and other polls that show no "bounce" at all. Rasmussen's numbers this morning are starting to tick upward for Obama, suggesting a modest but discernible "bounce."
Two factors are at play: for one, the true impact of events on the ground may not be known for weeks. Public opinion is often slow to form. In 1984, Democrat Walter Mondale's announcement of Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate--the first women to appear on the national ticket of either party--produced a flurry of media excitement and a modest jump in the polls. Within weeks, any gain had evaporated.
Just as important: presidential races are not decided by popular vote, but rather by 51 state-wide races (D.C. has three electoral votes). Thus, PollTrack will keep a close eye on public opinion surveys as they emerge out of battleground states in the coming weeks.
One demographic to watch closely: so-called Reagan Democrats--white, conservative, mostly working-class who broke with their party to support Ronald Reagan in the 1980s--in key states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Many of these voters so far have been disinclined to vote for Obama but disgruntled with Republicans. Did the DNC succeed in increasing their trust in Obama? Will McCain's VP pick appeal to these voters? Will McCain and Palin's speeches, and the Republican National Convention in general, convince these voters that they are true "mavericks" who proffer real change and a departure from the policies of the Bush administration?
Indeed, the race appears very fluid right now, with CBS News reporting that "a significant number of voters who have yet to finally make up their minds."
Posted Sep 01, 2008 at 1:54 AM by Maurice Berger
Possible problem for McCain: today's CNN/Opinion Research poll also reports that by a margin of 50% to 45% voters believe that Sarah Palin is not qualified to be president. While she has solidified McCain's support among religious conservatives and Evangelical Christians, could her perceived lack of gravitas suppress McCain's numbers among independents, moderate Republicans, and conservative Democrats. Or, as in the case of Dan Qualye, also roundly criticized for being inexperienced and untested at the time of his nomination by George H. W. Bush in 1988, will the public pay more attention to the top of the ticket, where McCain's experience relative to Obama could be a net plus for the Republican.
Posted Sep 01, 2008 at 1:32 AM by Maurice Berger
A new CNN/Opinion Research poll taken entire after the Democratic National Convention suggests that the race between Obama and McCain is exactly as was before the convention: tied. According to the new poll, Obama leads by one point, 49% to 48%. Yesterday and today, Rasmussen's daily tracker observes a similar contraction to pre-convention numbers. So any "bounce" in public opinion generated by Denver appears to have evaporated.
The reason: it's likely the the rapid fire succession of the two VP announcements and conventions--the latter a few days apart rather than three to four weeks apart, timing that has occurred only a few other times in the history of the two parties--has made it difficult for the Democrats to sustain their "bounce." Further complicating things for Obama is the popularity of Sarah Palin among Christian conservatives, a nomination that has now pushed McCain's Republican party support to well over 90%.
The "bounce" generated by the DNC may have been canceled out by the buzz generated by McCain's announcement of his running mate. Writes CNN pollster Keating Holland: "The convention -- and particularly Obama's speech --
seems to be well-received. And the selection of Sarah Palin as the GOP running
mate, also seems to be well-received. So why is the race still a virtual tie?
Probably because the two events created equal and opposite bounces --assuming
that either one created a bounce at all."