<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<posts type="array">
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;The very coalition that assured and strengthened Obama's win last November is now standing strongly behind the president's nominee for the US Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor: Boosted by large black, Hispanic and Jewish majorities, American voters
approve--55% to 25%--President Obama's nomination of Judge
Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court, according to a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=1308&amp;amp;What=&amp;amp;strArea=;&amp;amp;strTime=0&quot;&gt;Quinnipiac poll&lt;/a&gt;. Back in November, African-American support for Obama was well over 90%, Jewish support was just under 80%, and Hispanic support near the 70% mark.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-04T11:45:36-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">947</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-05T09:54:23-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Sotomayor Enjoys Broad Support Within Obama Coalition </title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-05T09:54:23-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to the issue of how &quot;race&quot; played out on Election Day, one thing is certain: if the outcome was determined only by white people, John McCain would be president, by a landslide. Indeed, Obama garnered just 43% of the white vote to McCain's 57%, a 14% deficit that was only marginally better than Kerry or Gore's total and about the same as Bill Clinton. The Democrat was able to count on four groups for his impressive victory. Preeminently, the intensity and unprecedented numbers of African-American voters made the difference for Obama, especially in the closest fought states, such as Indiana, North Carolina, Virginia, and Ohio. This support was almost singlehandedly responsible for the Democrat's ability to pick off the true-red states of NC and IN. The black vote also deepened and widened Obama's victories in scores of Kerry-blue states, from New York to California. &lt;span&gt;Hispanic voters represented another important asset: Obama led McCain among Hispanics 67% to 30%, a 10% increase in Democrat support from 2004. in his home state, McCain trailed Obama among Hispanics 61% 
to 36%, making that race surprisingly close. The Hispanic vote was crucial to Obama in the southwest, handing him easy victories in Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico. And in Florida, where Cuban-Americans have traditionally 
tilted the Hispanic vote towards Republicans in virtually every presidential cycle, Obama won 57% to 42%. Another religious minority also played a key role in several states: Jewish-Americans, who gave the Democrat nearly 80% of their vote. (Jews are one of the demographic groups most loyal to the Democratic Party.) The Jewish vote in South Florida was crucial to handing the Republican leaning state to Obama. (Another state where the Jewish vote made a big difference: Ohio). Finally, through amazing outreach to the 18 to 29-year old demographic, the Obama campaign was able to boost the turnout of younger voters by more than 3 million, enough to hand the Democrat such razor close states as North Carolina and Indiana. Together, these four groups represented not only a winning coalition, but a shift in the power-base of the national electorate, allowing racial and religious minorities and young people to make a profound difference in the outcome of Election 2008. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-11-10T10:09:41-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">479</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-11-10T10:14:26-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Why Obama Won: Building A Powerful Coalition</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-11-10T11:14:06-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;An analysis of early voting data in Nevada suggests that in that state, at least, three of Obama's key constituents are under-performing. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lvrj.com/news/33494194.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Las Vegas Review-Journal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; writes: &quot;As Nevadans continue
to flock to the polls, turnout among those three groups is lagging, at
least in the early going. While turnout statewide was nearly 25 percent through Sunday, it was
just 20 percent among Hispanic voters, 14 percent among voters under 30
and 15 percent among those who didn't vote in the last three elections,
according to an analysis of state early voting records through Sunday
prepared by America Votes, an organization that works to mobilize
voters.&quot; Such under-voting could be a problem for Obama in the most competitive and closely fought swing states, including skewing likely voter models in polls in the direction of voters who may not show up in anticipated numbers.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class=&quot;story_main_body_font&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-29T11:53:34-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">378</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-30T09:03:11-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Are New, Hispanic, and Younger Voters Under-performing?</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-30T09:03:11-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/111301/Hispanic-Voters-Divided-Religion.aspx&quot;&gt;Gallup &lt;/a&gt;survey released on Tuesday reports that while Hispanic voters support Barack Obama by a wide margin over John McCain, there is a significant difference in the Hispanic vote by 
religion: &quot;Catholic Hispanics support Obama by a 39-point margin, while Hispanics 
who are Protestant or who identify with some other non-Catholic Christian faith 
support Obama by a much smaller 10-point margin.&quot; Obama's leads overall among all Hispanic registered voters by 62% to 30%. It is doubtful that this disparity will impact on the outcome of the election, unless, of course, it is very close.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-21T15:17:25-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">315</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-23T17:02:40-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Gallup: Hispanic Voters Divided By Religion</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-23T17:02:40-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;John McCain, who bucked his own party to support controversial immigration reform legislation--a bill embraced by Hispanic voters--is now struggling with this all-important Demographic, falling well below the level of support that helped lift 
President Bush to the White House. A Gallup poll conducted last week reported a staggering 42% national lead for Obama among Hispanics: 64% to 26%. This deficit is especially detrimental to the Republican in key battlegrounds with large and influential Hispanic populations--including Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Virginia--states where he is now behind or tied.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-10T13:40:06-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">242</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-10T13:40:06-04:00</published-at>
    <title>McCain In Trouble With Hispanic Voters</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-10T13:41:14-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
</posts>
