<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<posts type="array">
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In order to cope with the fall-out of the Great Recession, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/126197/Spending-Less-Becoming-New-Norm-Americans.aspx&quot;&gt;Gallup reports in a new survey&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;nearly 6 in 10 Americans (57%) now say they are spending less money
than they used to, and 38% say this reduced spending will be their new,
normal spending pattern. In a marked shift from earlier this decade,
62% of Americans now say they more enjoy saving rather than spending,
while 35% say the reverse.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2010-02-28T10:58:34-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1401</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2010-03-03T09:46:29-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Spending Less To Cope With Recession</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2010-03-03T09:46:29-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/125303/Americans-See-Economic-Recovery-Long-Way-Off.aspx&quot;&gt;According to a new Gallup survey&lt;/a&gt;, American remain pessimistic about the economy: &quot;Americans are thinking in terms of years, not months, when pondering
how much longer it will be before the U.S. economy starts to recover.
The vast majority (67%) believe it will be at least two years before a
recovery starts, and nearly half (46%) think it will be at least three
years . . . a full third of Americans (34%) say it will be four or more years
before a recovery starts, the mean response is 4 &amp;frac12; years-- putting the
average predicted onset of recovery well into 2014.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2010-01-20T18:13:22-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1345</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2010-01-27T09:15:57-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Pessimistic About Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2010-01-27T09:15:57-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In a bit of good news for the Obama administration, a new Rasmussen survey, reports that &quot;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;51% of voters 
nationwide continue to believe that the economic woes can still be blamed on 
Administration of George W. Bush . . . [the] survey 
finds that just 41% hold the opposite view and believe the policies of Barack 
Obama are to blame.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2010-01-10T11:54:32-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1295</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2010-01-12T09:30:23-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Continue To Blame Bush For The Bad Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2010-01-12T09:30:23-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;How soon will the recession end? Not so soon, if American perception are correct.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/december_2009/50_expect_u_s_will_be_in_recession_at_end_of_2010&quot;&gt; According to a newly released Rasmussen survey&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;50% of Americans believe the country will still be in
recession at the end of 2010 . . . Just 20% disagree and say America will not be in recession by then. 31% aren&amp;rsquo;t sure. While many economists say the recession is over, 71% of all
adults say it is not. 75% of investors still
believe the economy is in a recession.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2010-01-02T15:29:18-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1286</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2010-01-06T09:30:07-05:00</published-at>
    <title>50% of Americans Believe Recession Will Continue Into 2010</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2010-01-06T09:30:07-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/11/2149405.aspx&quot;&gt;Per MSNBC &lt;em&gt;First Read&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;A new CNBC poll . . . has Obama&amp;rsquo;s economic approval rating at 46%, the
Democratic Party&amp;rsquo;s at 39%, and the GOP&amp;rsquo;s at 26%. Also in the poll, a
plurality (43%) believes the economy will improve in the course of the
next year. And the survey shows a lack in confidence in American
institutions: 77% say they have confidence in the military, compared
with 39% for the Supreme Court, 24% for the Fed, 19% for the Treasury
Department, 18% for FEMA, 17% for health insurance companies, 15% for
Congress, and 10% for the financial industry. Ouch. Here&amp;rsquo;s one more
thing: By a 54%-33% margin, Americans say they prefer using the
leftover TARP money for deficit reduction rather than for more stimulus
spending.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-12-13T10:36:21-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1265</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-12-15T09:38:42-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Remain Pessimistic About Economy And The Nation</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-12-15T09:38:42-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index2/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt;Despite signs of economic recovery, &quot;The Rasmussen Consumer Index&lt;/a&gt;, which measures the economic confidence of
consumers on a daily basis, held relatively steady at 71.8 on Saturday.
The index is down four points from two weeks ago and also down four
points from a month ago. Consumer confidence is now up 12 points from
the beginning of the year. Nationally, just 6% of adults rate the U.S. economy as good or
excellent. Fifty-eight percent (58%) give the economy a poor rating.
Among men, 8% give the economy a good or excellent rating, but 56% say
it's poor. Women are slightly less optimistic--6% rate it as good or
excellent, but 59% rate it as poor.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-12-05T11:10:01-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1249</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-12-11T09:38:39-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Rasmussen: Consumer Confidence Continues To Lag</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-12-11T09:38:39-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;The slow but steady upturn in public optimism about the state of the economy has apparent come to a halt, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/08/poll.economy/index.html?eref=igoogle_cnn&quot;&gt;according to a CNN/Opinion Research survey&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Two years into the recession, Americans don't see economic
conditions getting better any time soon, and the steady growth in
optimism that previous surveys measured throughout the year appears to
have stalled . . 34% of
those questioned say that things are going well in the country today.
That finding is 14 percentage points higher than a year ago but a dip
of 3 points since November. 'This the first time in Barack Obama's presidency that this number has gone down,' said Keating Holland, CNN's polling director. According
to the survey, 39% of the respondents said the country is still
in a downturn, up 6 percentage points from last month. Nearly half of
those questioned said the economy has stabilized and a small minority,
15%, think the country is starting to recover.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-12-08T10:15:32-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1254</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-12-09T09:13:41-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Less Optimistic About Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-12-09T09:13:41-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracycorps.com/strategy/2009/11/the-economy-at-a-sensitive-juncture/&quot;&gt;A new Public Policy Polling survey suggests that Americans are ambivalent, at best, about the state of the economy&lt;/a&gt;. The poll &quot;&quot;reveals a more pessimistic electorate than we have seen since the
early months of 2009, with feelings on the economy turning more
negative after months of slight but steady improvement.&quot; Who is benefitting from this doubt, Democrats or Republicans? Hard to tell according to PPP: &quot;The country is not ready to listen to a narrative
about how Democrats have brought the economy 'back from the brink' and
averted an even worse disaster, as articulated by the president in his
joint session address to Congress earlier this year. That leaves a lot
of receptivity to Republican messages that focus on wasted spending and
exploding deficits.&quot; Yet, half of the voters in swing (but Republican-leaning) districts continue to &quot;believe
that President Obama&amp;rsquo;s economic recovery plan could help,&quot; a number that suggests the
economy could still break in favor of Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-11-30T12:50:24-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1239</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-12-01T09:13:32-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Ambivalent About The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-12-01T09:13:32-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In another indication that the high unemployment rate is weighing heavily on Americans, Rasmussen reports that most Americans favor extending unemployment benefits for an additional 20 weeks, with 59%
favoring the extension of those benefits and 31% opposing it.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-11-10T10:34:52-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1213</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-11-11T09:09:32-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Support Extending Unemployment Benefits</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-11-11T09:09:32-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/september_2009/economy_still_tops_list_of_voter_concerns2&quot;&gt;The economy remains the number one issue for American voters, according to a new analysis by Rasmussen Reports&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;No matter how we ask the question, voters continue to put economic
issues such as jobs and economic growth highest on their list of
concerns. Every night, Rasmussen Reports asks likely voters to choose
from a list of five broad issues which is most important to them in
terms of how they vote . . . The economy dominated Election 2008 and has been named as the top
concern by 37% to 52% of voters every week over the past year. No other
issue has risen above 20% among voters. On Election Day, National
Security was second, but it has slipped behind fiscal policy concerns
and domestic issues in recent weeks.. . . However, the number of voters who see economic issues as most important has slipped somewhat since President Barack Obama was inaugurated in January. For nearly all of February, 50% or more of
voters saw the economy as the top issue. By June, that percentage
slipped down to the low 40&amp;rsquo;s and was down to 37% in late August. It
bounced back to 44% for the week ending September 13&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-09-20T09:45:38-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1098</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-09-23T09:52:13-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Economy Top Concern For US Voters</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-09-23T09:52:13-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;With an unemployment rate now hovering around 30%--28.9% to be exact--the city of Detroit serves as a national symbol of the continued effects of the Great Recession and a lingering problem for the Obama administration and Congress. As &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2009/08/unemployment-in-detroit-climbs-to-289.html&quot;&gt;ABC News&lt;/a&gt; reports: &quot;The unemployment rate in the city of Detroit rose to 28.9 percent in
July, the highest rate of unemployment since Michigan started keeping
modern numbers.&quot; Will unemployment rates that remain stagnant or even continue to climb put an damper on the public's perceptions about economic recovery? Stay tuned.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-08-29T09:11:32-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1061</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-09-03T09:05:52-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Unemployment Hits 28.9% in Detroit</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-09-03T09:05:52-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In another sign that economic conditions may be improving in the United States, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;the Rasmussen Consumer Index, which measures the economic confidence of 
consumers on a daily basis, reached its high for the year last Thursday. By Sunday, the Index was exactly where it was a week 
ago and is up eleven points from one month ago. Consumer confidence is now up +19 
points from the beginning of 2009. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-08-16T15:27:22-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1051</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-08-17T10:03:37-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Consumer Confidence Up +19% Since The Beginning of 2009</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-08-17T10:03:37-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In yet another sign that the American public is sensensing an upturn in the economy--after more than two and a half years of recession--&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index2/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt;Rasmussen Consumer Index&lt;/a&gt;, which measures the economic 
confidence of consumers on a daily basis, climbed five points on Sunday, 
reaching its highest level since the Lehman Brothers collapse in September 2008. 
At 78.8, the Index is up five points over the past week, up 18 points over the 
past month and up 19 points from the beginning of this year.&quot; Still, the picture is not entirely rosy: &quot;&lt;/span&gt;Nationally, 12% of adults rate the economy as good or 
excellent, while 51% rate the economy as poor. Men (19%) and women (17%) under 
40 are slightly more optimistic about the current state of the U.S. economy than 
men (8%) and women over 40 (6%).&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-08-09T10:35:09-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">1037</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-08-10T11:22:41-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Consumer Confidence Highest in Eleven Months</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-08-10T11:22:41-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1347&quot;&gt;A new Quinnipiac University poll may give President Obama reason to worry&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;President Barack Obama gets a lackluster 49% to 44% approval 
rating in Ohio, considered by many to be the most important swing state in a 
presidential election . . . This is President Obama's lowest approval rating in any national or statewide 
Quinnipiac University poll since he was inaugurated and is down from 62% to 31% in a May 6 survey.&amp;nbsp; By a small 48% to 
46% margin, voters disapprove of the way Obama is handling the economy . . . This is down 
from a 57% to 36% approval May 6. A total of 66% of Ohio voters are 'somewhat dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with the way things are going in 
the state, while 33% are 'very satisfied' or 'somewhat satisfied,' 
numbers that haven't changed since Obama was elected.&quot; (A new Public Policy Polling survey shows a similar drop in Obama's supports in another key 2008 swing state--Virginia--where his positive approval comes in at only 48%.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-07-07T11:59:08-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">997</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-07-09T09:39:49-04:00</published-at>
    <title>President Obama's Approval Rating Falling Behind In Key Swing State Of Ohio</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-07-09T09:39:49-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Despite slight uoticks in some economic indicators, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt;Rasumussen reports that a solid majority of Americans continue to rate the economy as poor&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Nationally, only 10% of adults rate the U.S. economy good or excellent while 55% 
rate it as poor. While 13% of men give the economy positive ratings, only 7% of 
women do the same. But 55% of both men and women say the economy is in poor 
shape.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-07-06T14:46:24-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">990</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-07-08T09:48:52-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Rasmussen: Majority of Americans Continue To Rate Economy As Poor</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-07-08T09:48:52-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/121262/Sharp-Differences-Partisan-Views-Economic-Problems.aspx?CSTS=alert&quot;&gt;A Gallup poll reveals that when it comes to perceptions about the economy and the current economic crisis, sharp partisan differences prevail&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Republicans and Democrats view economic issues facing the country
today from substantially different perspectives. Republicans are most
likely to be worried about the increasing federal deficit, increasing
federal income taxes, and problems state governments have in funding
their budgets, while Democrats are most worried about the rising
unemployment rate, Americans without health care insurance, and the
increasing cost of health care. These results underscore the political tensions that have arisen as the
Obama administration and Congress wrestle with how to fix the country's
economic problems, while at the same time dealing with the longer-term
impact of those efforts. Taken as a whole, Republicans are more
concerned than Democrats about the impact of increased federal and
state spending, and government regulation of business, while Democrats
are more concerned about the societal problems that the increased
spending and regulation are designed to address.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's a sampling of the top priorities by party affiliation: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/ewmepd0rx0ufklz7qhnnzw.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;ewmepd0rx0ufklz7qhnnzw&quot; width=&quot;564&quot; height=&quot;374&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-28T11:29:39-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">983</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-07-01T09:35:00-04:00</published-at>
    <title>When It Comes To Perceptions About Economic Crisis, Sharp Partisan Differences</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-07-01T09:35:00-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In another sign that Americans remain uneasy with the government's economic stimulus plan, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/economic_stimulus_package/june_2009/76_say_government_likely_to_waste_stimulus_money&quot;&gt;a Rasmussen reports survey &lt;/a&gt;indicates that 76% of Americans say it is at least 
somewhat likely that a large amount of money in the $787-billion economic 
stimulus plan will be wasted due to inadequate government oversight. Nearly half (46%) say it is very likely, according to a new 
Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Only 18% say it is not likely that taxpayer money will be 
wasted. 65% of Republicans say it is very likely 
stimulus money will be wasted, a view shared by just 32% of Democrats and the 
plurality of adults (44%) not affiliated with either party&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-24T11:41:54-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">977</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-26T09:15:02-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Fear Stimulus Money Will Be Wasted</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-26T09:15:02-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Americans continue to rank the economy as the most pressing issue facing the country, a new Gallup survey reports. But this number has actually dropped considerably from the beginning of 2009: &quot;Two-thirds of Americans (65%), when asked in an open-ended fashion,
continue to name economic problems as the most important problem facing
the country -- but this number has steadily declined from 86% in
February.Mentions of the economy in Gallup's June update on this question match
the net total mentions from June of last year, prior to the global
economic collapse. The &quot;net percent mentioning economic problems&quot;
reflects the total percentage of respondents who cite some aspect of
the economy as the nation's most important problem. The single most
frequently mentioned concern more broadly -- a general reference to the
economy -- is down from 47% in May to 41% now. Specific mentions of
unemployment are steady at 14%.&quot; Here is the list in order of priority:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/37cuimbzvu2h7a_vxtkdwg.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;37cuimbzvu2h7a_vxtkdwg&quot; width=&quot;516&quot; height=&quot;391&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-24T23:58:27-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">979</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-25T09:39:46-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Gallup: Economy Still Top Priority For Americans, But Less So</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-25T09:39:46-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1091a1ObamaandPolitics.pdf&quot;&gt;A new poll out from &lt;em&gt;ABC News/Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; suggests that while President Obama continues to hold a relatively high approval rating, voters are less approving of his handling of the economy, a possible future red flag: &quot;President Obama remains on his honeymoon -- but with a hint of clouds over the beach.
They signal economic impatience. A still-impressive 65% of
Americans in this new ABC News/Washington Post poll approve of Obama's
job performance. But there's been a retrenchment in the expectation
that his stimulus plan will improve the economy -- and, consequently, a
halt in what had been steadily improving views of the nation's direction. A narrow majority, 52%, now thinks Obama's stimulus program has
helped or will help the nation's economy -- down from 59% in
late April. While he's vulnerable elsewhere as well, it's the economy
that's his make-or-break issue -- and his advantage over the
Republicans in trust to handle it, while still broad, has narrowed from
a record 37 points, 61%-24%, in April, to 24 points, 55%-31%, today&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-23T14:10:26-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">976</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-24T09:34:52-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Less Certain About Obama's Handling Of The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-24T09:34:52-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;While &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;may be stating the obvious, Americabs remain very pessimistic about the economy, though they attitudes have taken an upturn since January.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt; Rasmussen Report's &quot;Consumer Index&lt;/a&gt;, which measures the economic confidence of consumers on a daily 
basis, was up two points on Sunday to 71.8. The index is now down a point from a 
week ago and down three points from one month ago. However, today's index is up 
twelve points from its first reading of 2009 . . . Nationally, only 9% of adults rate the economy as good or 
excellent, while 57% disagree and say the economy is poor. 30% 
rate their personal finances as either good or excellent, while 24% rate their 
personal finances as poor&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-14T12:29:33-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">963</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-16T09:40:03-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Remain Anxious About The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-16T09:40:03-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/62_say_bush_not_obama_to_blame_for_ongoing_economic_problems&quot;&gt;According to Rasmussen Reports&lt;/a&gt;, most Americans blame George W. Bush and not President Obama for the economic crisis gripping the nation: &quot;Obama contends he inherited the nation&amp;rsquo;s ongoing economic problems and that
his actions since taking office are not to blame. 62% of U.S. voters agree with the president that the problems are due
to the recession that began under the Bush administration. Just 27% of voters say the problems are being caused more
by the policies Obama has put in place since taking office, according
to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. 10%
are not sure which president is more to blame . . .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;. . . Not surprisingly, 88% of Democrats say it&amp;rsquo;s Bush&amp;rsquo;s fault.
However, Republicans are more evenly divided. Thirty-four percent 34% of the GOP faithful say the economic problems can be traced to the Bush Administration, while 51% blame Obama&amp;rsquo;s policies. Among voters not affiliated with either party, 61% say the Bush recession is to blame versus 28% who say Obama is at fault.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-06-01T11:28:20-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">938</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-06-04T10:07:56-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Economic Crisis: Bush, Not, Obama The Source of the Problem</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-06T16:57:19-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;According to Gallup, a slightly reduced majority of Americans see the economy as the most serious problem facing the nation: &quot;About two-thirds of Americans, down from 76% last month and 86% in
February, say the economy -- or a specific aspect of it -- is the most
important problem facing the United States today&amp;nbsp; . . . this is the first month since
economic concern surged last fall that fewer than 70% of Americans have
named the economy, overall, as the nation's top problem. The finding
coincides with significant improvement in public attitudes about the
economy, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/118324/Weekly-Economic-Wrap-Mood-Hits-16-Month-High.aspx&quot;&gt;Gallup's Consumer Mood Index hitting a 16-month high last week&lt;/a&gt;.
Still, the economy remains the undisputed issue of concern to Americans
on Gallup's monthly Most Important Problem measure, with no other
single issue named by more than 9%. The current 69% mentioning some aspect of the economy includes 47%
citing the economy in general and 14% citing unemployment or the jobs
situation. Seven percent mention &quot;lack of money&quot; and 5% the federal
budget deficit, while 2% name taxes.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-05-16T15:29:56-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">915</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-05-20T09:14:32-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Slightly Smaller Majority See Economy As America's Most Pressing Problem</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-05-20T09:14:32-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;According to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/4/22/TX/288&quot;&gt;DailyKos/Research 2000 poll&lt;/a&gt;, 48% of Texas Republicans think their state should be an
independent nation while 48% think it should remain part of the United
States.&lt;br /&gt;Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) floated the notion of secession at a recent tax protest. Among all Texans, 61% want their state to remain part of the Union while 35% prefer an independent nation.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-04-24T00:37:38-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">882</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T09:51:50-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Texas Republicans Support Secession</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-28T09:51:50-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/117415/Americans-Confident-Obama-Economy.aspx?CSTS=alert&quot;&gt;According to a new Gallup poll, Americans trust Obama more than any other political leader on the issue of the economy&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Over two-thirds of Americans -- 71% -- have a great deal or a fair amount of 
confidence in President Obama to do or recommend the right thing for the 
economy, a much higher level of confidence than is given to Federal Reserve 
Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, or the Democratic or 
Republican leaders in Congress.&quot; The poll reached the following conclusions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst&quot;&gt;Obama gets almost universal confidence from 
Democrats, two-thirds support from independents, and just over one-third 
confidence from Republicans.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst&quot;&gt;Geithner appears to be somewhat more 
politicized than Bernanke. Geithner's confidence rating ranges from 70% among 
Democrats to just 24% among Republicans. Bernanke, on the other hand, has a more 
modest 28-point partisan gap, with a 64% confidence rating among Democrats vs. 
36% among Republicans. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst&quot;&gt;The partisan ratings of Bernanke have 
shifted from last year, when he was serving under a Republican president. At 
that time, the Fed chairman received a 61% confidence rating from Republicans, 
43% from independents, and just a 40% rating from Democrats. Apparently, 
Americans associate the Fed chairman with the particular president he happens to 
be serving under.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst&quot;&gt;Democrats have more faith in their leaders 
than Republicans do in theirs. Seventy-nine percent of Democrats say they have 
confidence in the Democratic leaders in Congress on the economy. Although this 
is lower than the confidence Democrats have in Obama, it is higher than the 57% 
confidence rating Republicans give the Republican leaders in Congress.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-04-13T14:21:28-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">864</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-04-14T10:07:28-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Trust Obama Most On Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-14T10:07:28-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;According to Rasmussen's Consumer Confidence Index, &quot;which measures consumer confidence on a daily basis, gained another three points on Sunday following a five point gain on Saturday. At 77.1, the Index has reached its highest level since last September 20.Consumer confidence is up 9 points from a week ago, 19 points from a month ago, and is even up a point-and-a-half from a year ago. which measures consumer confidence on a daily basis, gained another three points on Sunday following a five point gain on Saturday. At 77.1, the Index has reached its highest level since last September 20. Consumer confidence is up 9 points from a week ago, 19 points from a month ago, and is even up a point-and-a-half from a year ago.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name>Maurice Berger, Political Director, PollTrack</contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-04-12T11:06:03-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">861</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-04-13T10:21:42-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans More Optimistic About Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-04-13T10:21:42-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/116962/Americans-Economy-Takes-Precedence-Environment.aspx&quot;&gt;According to Gallup, for the first time in the polling organization's 25-year history of asking Americans
about the &quot;trade-off between environmental protection and economic
growth, a majority of Americans say economic growth should be given the
priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent&lt;/a&gt;. Gallup first asked Americans about this trade-off in 1984, at which
time over 60% chose the environmental option. Support for the
environment was particularly high in 1990-1991, and in the late 1990s
and 2000, when the dot-com boom perhaps made economic growth more of a
foregone conclusion. The percentage of Americans choosing the environment slipped below
50% in 2003 and 2004, but was still higher than the percentage choosing
the economy. Sentiments have moved up and down over the last several
years, but this year, the percentage of Americans choosing the
environment fell all the way to 42%, while the percentage choosing the
economy jumped to 51%.&quot; No doubt, the reason for this shift in American sentiment on the ecology almost certainly has to do
with the current economic recession. As nearly all recent
Gallup surveys suggest, the economy is foremost in Americans' minds.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-19T13:40:55-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">816</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-20T09:37:21-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Gallup: Economy Trumps Environment</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-20T09:37:21-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Is it a statistical blip or do Americans see the tide turning in a recession that has plagued the nation since December 2007: After five days of steady gains, the Rasmussen Consumer Index, which measures consumer 
confidence on a daily basis, is now 
at its highest level of 2009. In fact, confidence is now at the highest level 
since the morning after Barack Obama was elected President in November. The moved up another point on Sunday to 67.0. That&amp;rsquo;s up 
ten points from a week ago and up ten points from a month ago. However, it 
remains down nine points from a year ago.&quot; Only time will tell if we're moving up from the bottom or experiencing a lull in what has been a year-long dowaward spiral.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-15T13:10:37-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">812</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-17T09:07:19-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Consumer Confidence At Highest Level Since November 2008</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-17T09:07:19-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;The number of Americans who say they are &quot;suffering&quot; as a result of the nation's economic downturn has increased. Gallup reports that the &quot;number of Americans classified as 'suffering' has increased by 3 million over 
the past year. While an average of 3% of Americans were suffering in February of 
2008, the number has remained higher over the past 12 months, consistently 
between 4% and 5%. While a monthly high of 5% was recorded last June when gas 
prices spiked, some days in March have reached 6%, suggesting suffering is only on the uptrend.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/110125/Gallup-Daily-Life-Evaluation.aspx&quot;&gt;The 
Gallup-Healthways Life Evaluation Index&lt;/a&gt; asks at least 1,000 Americans each 
day to &quot;evaluate their current lives as well as their expectations of where they 
will be in five years using a 'ladder' scale with steps number from 0 to 10, 
where '0' indicates the worst possible life and &quot;10&quot; the best possible life. 
Americans in the 'thriving' group say that they presently stand on step 7 or 
higher of the ladder and expect to stand on step 8 or higher five years from 
now. Americans in the 'suffering' group, on the other hand, say they presently 
stand on steps 0 to 4 of the ladder and expect to stand on steps 0 to 4 five 
years from now. Those who are neither thriving nor suffering are considered to 
be 'struggling.'&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed, the public's overall view of the economy remains bleak. According to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr090311-1tb1.pdf&amp;amp;id=4307&quot;&gt;Ipsos/McClatchy poll&lt;/a&gt;, 57% of Americans believe that the worst is yet to come
as far as the economy is concerned. 35% say it has stabilized but not
yet begun to improve; only 3% believe the country has turned the corner.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-12T17:01:40-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">807</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-13T09:58:07-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Increase In The Number Of Americans Who Say They Are &quot;Suffering&quot;</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-13T11:21:58-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to the economy, Americans are decidedly pessimistic. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/53_say_it_s_likely_the_u_s_will_enter_a_depression_similar_to_1930_s&quot;&gt;According to a new Rasmussen Reports survey&lt;/a&gt;, 53% now think the United States is at least somewhat likely to enter a 
1930&amp;rsquo;s-like depression within the next few years; 39% think it's unlikely. 19% say a Depression is Very Likely, 
7% say it is not at all likely. The latest results are more pessimistic than those found in early January, notes Rasmussen, &quot;when 44% said a 1930&amp;rsquo;s-like depression was 
likely in the next few years, and 46% disagreed.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/americans_still_see_economic_recovery_as_a_long_term_process&quot;&gt;Pessimistic or otherwise, Americans also expect&lt;/a&gt; &quot;the U.S. economy will be stronger in five years than it is today, but most also 
expect very little to change in the next 12 months.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-11T14:29:51-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">802</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-12T08:32:29-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Expect 1930s-Style Depression</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-12T08:32:29-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/116359/Satisfaction-Improves-Slightly-Steadily.aspx&quot;&gt;Americans are slightly more satisfied with the state of the country, according to a new Gallup poll&lt;/a&gt;: While overall satisfaction remains low, at
an average of 21% for the past week, this number represents a slight improvement from the 14% satisfaction rating in early February: &quot;Gallup has measured national satisfaction daily since Barack Obama
took office, and also did so in late October through December 2008. In
the latter part of 2008, satisfaction ratings ranged from a low of 9%
in Dec. 12-14 polling to a high of just 14% in the first few days after
the election and after Thanksgiving. Little seemed to change when Obama first took office -- in Jan.
21-23 polling, 14% of Americans said they were satisfied. After showing
a brief improvement in late January, the percentage who reported being
satisfied with the state of the nation settled back to 14% by early
February. But since that time, satisfaction has shown a slight but
steady improvement, and has been 20% or higher each of the last seven
days.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-08T11:38:45-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">794</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-09T10:19:50-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Slightly More Satisfied With State Of The Nation</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-09T10:19:50-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In a new poll registering voter concerns, the economy still comes out on top. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/importance_of_issues&quot;&gt;The latest Rasmussen Reports survey&lt;/a&gt; found 
that 86% of likely voters consider the issue to be very important in terms of 
how they vote in elections, and another 11% consider it somewhat important. Only 1% do not consider it an 
important issue. &quot;The percentage of voters who see the economy as a very 
important issue has reached its highest level in recent years, up from 83% just 
days before Barack Obama was elected president. Nearly as high in terms of voter concern is the issue of 
government ethics and corruption. 81% consider it a very 
important issue, up from 74% in October 2008. Another 15% consider the issue to 
be somewhat important, while only 3% do not consider it to be 
important.&quot; The intensity of issues that voters consider &quot;very important&quot; breaks down as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;renderedtable&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Economy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;86%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov't Ethics/Corruption&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;81%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Education&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;64%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taxes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;61%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nat'l Security/War on Terror&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;60%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Social Security&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;59%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Health Care&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;58%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Immigration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;51%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;War in Iraq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;43%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abortion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;36%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-03T12:39:36-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">789</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-05T09:04:23-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Concerned Most About The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-05T09:04:23-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/116242/Initial-Reaction-Obama-Budget-Tilts-Positive.aspx&quot;&gt;According to a new Gallup Poll&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Americans' first reactions to President Barack Obama's new 10-year
budget plan are more positive than negative, although a sizable group
of Americans say they haven't been following news about the plan and
have not yet formed an opinion.&quot; 44% say their reaction to the new plan is positive and 26%
saying it's negative, with the rest having no opinion. There is a clear partisan divide in opinion: &quot;The poll data clearly show that Americans are sharply divided along
party lines in their initial reactions to the budget plan, which
includes $3.6 trillion in spending in 2010 and a wide variety of
spending plans and tax adjustments in the years thereafter. More than 6
in 10 Republicans say their first reaction is negative and nearly 7 in
10 Democrats say their reaction is positive. Reaction to the plan is
more evenly divided among independents, but is generally more positive
than negative.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-03T13:13:09-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">790</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-04T09:33:33-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Initial Reaction To Obama Budget Plan Is Modestly Positive</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-04T09:33:33-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In an indication that Americans remain pessimistic about the nation's economy future, the vast majority of respondents in a recent poll now rate the economy as poor: According to Rasmussen Reports, just 8% of adults rate the economy as good or excellent and 66% say the economy 
is poor. Meanwhile only 11% say the economy is getting better and 66% believe it 
is getting worse. 81% think the United States is 
currently in a recession, while 8% disagree. This lack of confidence represents one of the most daunting challenges facing the new Obama administration. In recessionary times, a lack of optimism can suppress consumer spending, leading to a vicious cycle of economic anxiety and decline. &lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; &lt;o:shapedefaults v:ext=&quot;edit&quot; spidmax=&quot;1026&quot; /&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; &lt;o:shapelayout v:ext=&quot;edit&quot;&gt; &lt;o:idmap v:ext=&quot;edit&quot; data=&quot;1&quot; /&gt; &lt;/o:shapelayout&gt;&lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-03-01T11:52:25-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">786</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-03-02T10:12:10-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Two-Thirds of Americans Rate Economy As Poor</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-03-02T10:12:10-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/116083/Views-Government-Aid-Depend-Program.aspx&quot;&gt;A &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt;/Gallup poll reports that Americans have mixed feelings about what the stimulus package should support&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;The Obama
administration and other advocates have argued that the massive
government spending on these programs is necessary to keep a bad
economic situation from getting far worse. Critics have found fault
with the amounts of money involved and the long-term impact or the lack
thereof. And the American public? A review and analysis of recent polling
assessing the various government initiatives makes it possible to
summarize American public opinion as follows: 1) Americans are
generally behind the $787 billion stimulus plan (officially known as
the &quot;American Recovery and Reinvestment Act&quot;), signed into law on Feb.
17, although with significant reservations; 2) Americans are solidly in
favor of aid to homeowners facing foreclosure; 3) Americans are solidly
against giving further aid to the auto companies; and 4) Americans are
generally against the idea of providing further aid to ailing banks
(although support for an actual government takeover of failing banks is
fluid and depends on how such a process is described).&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-24T19:56:28-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">778</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-26T09:18:19-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Have Mixed Feeling About Various Aspects Of The Stimulus</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-26T09:18:19-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A majority pf American adults--55%--believe the &quot;federal government would be 
rewarding bad behavior by providing mortgage subsidies to financially troubled 
homeowners.&quot; Among investors, 65% hold that view. A&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/housing/55_say_government_mortgage_help_rewards_bad_behavior&quot;&gt; new poll reports that &lt;/a&gt;among all adults, just 32% disagree. 
77% of Republicans and 60% of those not affiliated 
with either major political party believe the mortgage help subsidizes bad 
behavior. Most Democrats--51%--disagree.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-23T12:10:04-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">776</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-24T09:56:31-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Public Thinks Mortgage Subsidies Reward Bad Behavior</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-24T09:56:31-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Americans are growing increasingly gloomy about the economic crisis and their ability to weather it: &quot;The Rasmussen Consumer Index, which measures consumer 
confidence on a daily basis, fell two points on Monday to 55.5. That&amp;rsquo;s the 
lowest level of confidence ever recorded in the seven-year history of the 
Consumer Index, and the fourth time a new low has been set this month.The Rasmussen Investor Index fell nearly four points on 
Monday to 56.9, also a record low. For the Investor Index, the previous low had 
been established in mid-December.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The drop for both has been fairly significant. The Consumer 
Index has fallen eight points over the past month and 39 points over the past 
year. The Investor Index has fallen nine points over the past month and 45 
points over the past year.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-23T09:15:16-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">775</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-23T09:15:16-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Consumer, Investment Confidence Again Fall To Record Lows</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-23T09:15:16-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;The American public now rejects the idea that the stimulus package was a partisan effort: 60% of U.S. voters &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/february_2009/60_say_stimulus_plan_is_what_democrats_want_not_bipartisan&quot;&gt;according to a new poll &lt;/a&gt;say the economic stimulus plan &quot;is mostly what Democrats want rather than a truly 
bipartisan product.&quot; 25% think the plan is a bipartisan effort; 15% are not sure. &quot;80% of Republicans say the stimulus is 
mostly a Democratic plan, while Democrats themselves are evenly divided on the 
question. 62% of unaffiliated voters say it&amp;rsquo;s mostly what 
Democrats want, while 22% characterize the plan as bipartisan.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-13T14:22:52-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">764</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-19T09:15:06-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Read Stimulus Plan As Partisan</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-19T09:15:06-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Americans continue to remain circumspect about the stimulus packaged signed into law by President Obama. 38% of voters now believe the $787-billion stimulus will help the economy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/economic_stimulus_package/38_say_stimulus_plan_will_help_economy&quot;&gt;according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone
survey&lt;/a&gt;. 29% believe the plan will hurt and 24% believe it
will have little impact. Middle-income Americans are more likely to believe the bill
will hurt rather than help. Those with incomes below $40,000 or above
$100,000 are more optimistic.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-17T00:21:36-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">767</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-17T09:39:13-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Remain Skeptical of Stimulus Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-17T09:39:13-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A new Rasmussen survey suggests possible political storm clouds for Democrats on the question of how well they can manage the economy: &quot;Democrats are still trusted more than Republicans to handle 
the economy by a 44% to 39% margin, but their advantage on the issue has been 
slipping steadily since November; 17% are not sure which party they trust more to handle the 
economy. In the first poll conducted after Barack Obama was elected 
president, the Democrats held a 15-point lead over the GOP on economic issues. 
In December, their lead dropped to 12 points. In January, prior to Obama&amp;rsquo;s 
inauguration, Democrats held a nine-point lead on the issue.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-12T13:14:20-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">763</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-13T09:50:32-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Confidence In Democrats To Handle Economy Is Falling</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-13T09:50:32-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Following Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner&amp;rsquo;s presentation of the White House 
financial rescue plan, the &quot;Rasmussen Consumer Index fell a point-and-a-half to 
56.6. That&amp;rsquo;s another all-time record low, surpassing the mark set ten days ago. 
During 2008, record lows for consumer confidence were recorded on a regular 
basis. The Consumer Index, which measures the economic confidence of consumers 
on a daily basis, is down three points from a week ago and two points from a 
month ago.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T14:56:19-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">758</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-12T10:11:08-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Gaither Performance May Be Hurting Consumer Confidence</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-12T10:11:08-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/114577/Stimulus-Support-Edges-Higher.aspx&quot;&gt;A new &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt;/Gallup poll reports a decided uptick in support for the economic stimulus package now working its way through congress&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Public support for an $800 billion economic stimulus package has increased to 59% in the poll conducted Tuesday night, up from 52% in Gallup polling a week ago, as well as in late January. Most of the newfound support comes from rank-and-file Democrats,
suggesting President Barack Obama's efforts to sell the plan over the
past week -- including in his first televised news conference on Monday
-- have shored up support within his own party. Over the same period, support for the stimulus package held steady
among independents, with a slight majority in favor of it. The
percentage of Republicans favoring the package rose slightly from 24%
to 28%, but remains below the 34% support received in early January,
before Congress began its formal consideration of the package.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T18:43:39-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">762</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T18:43:39-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Gallup: Decided Uptick in Support For Stimulus Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T18:43:39-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;President Obama's Monday-night primtime news conference commanded relatively high ratings. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/495-million-people-watch-obama-press-conference/&quot;&gt;According to Nielsen, &quot;The conference was telecast live from 8 to 9PM on 8 networks
achieving a combined 30.8 household rating with 49,455,133 viewers&lt;/a&gt;. The
networks were ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Univision, CNN, Fox News Channel and
MSNBC. Just weeks after his inauguration in 1993 President Bill Clinton
also held a prime time news conference. That event focused on the
economy and was carried by 4 networks on February 15, 1993. The sum of
the audience of those networks was a 42.1 household rating with
64,300,000 viewers on average. On October 11, 2001, exactly a month after the attacks of September
11, President Bush held a prime time news conference that was carried
by 7 networks. The sum of those networks&amp;rsquo; audience from approximately
8-8:45PM was a 42.0 household rating with 64,813,000 viewers.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T15:34:26-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">760</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T15:34:26-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Obama News Conference Enjoyed High Ratings</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-11T15:34:26-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/february_2009/62_want_stimulus_plan_to_have_more_tax_cuts_less_spending&quot;&gt;According to a new poll&lt;/a&gt;, voters want the stimulus plan&amp;nbsp; making its way through Congress to 
include more tax cuts and less government spending: &quot;Just 14% would like to move in the opposite direction with 
more government spending and fewer tax cuts . . . 20% would be happy to pass 
it pretty much as is, and 5% are not sure. Republicans and unaffiliated voters overwhelmingly want to 
see more tax cuts and less government spending. Democrats are more evenly 
divided: 42% agree with the Republicans, 32% want to pass the plan as is, and 
22% would like to see more government spending and fewer tax cuts.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T11:14:50-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">752</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-10T11:24:06-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Want More Tax Cuts, Less Spending In Stimulus Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-10T11:24:06-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/114202/Obama-Upper-Hand-Stimulus-Fight.aspx&quot;&gt;According to a new Gallup poll&lt;/a&gt;, the American public gives President Obama a strong 67% approval rating 
for the way in which he is handling the government's efforts to pass an economic 
stimulus bill, while the Democrats and, in particular, the Republicans in 
Congress receive much lower approval ratings of 48% and 31%, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T11:52:16-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">753</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T11:52:16-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Support Obama in Stimulus Fight</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T11:52:16-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/february_2009/voters_evenly_divided_over_obama_s_warning_of_economic_catastrophe&quot;&gt;According to a new Rasmussen poll&lt;/a&gt;, Americans are almost evenly divided on whether the failure to pass the economic recovery bill working its way through Congress would be a &quot;catastrophe&quot; for the American economy. The survey finds that 
44% of Americans agree with Obama and 41% do not. &quot;There is a huge partisan divide on the question. Sixty-nine 
percent 69% of Democrats agree with the president's insistence that failure to 
pass a bill now means catastrophe, while 64% of Republicans do not. Among voters 
not affiliated with either major party, 32% say Obama's right, but 51% don't 
agree.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-08T10:35:10-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">751</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T10:15:43-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Divided On President Obama's Warning About Economic &quot;Catastrophe&quot;</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-09T10:15:43-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In a sign of growing voter concern and pessimism over the economy, a new Rasmussen survey reports that &quot;50% of U.S. voters say the final economic 
recovery plan that emerges from Congress is at least somewhat likely to make 
things worse rather than better, but 39% say such an outcome is not likely. 27% say the final legislation is Very 
Likely to make things worse, while just 7% say it&amp;rsquo;s Not at All 
Likely to have that effect.&quot; Right now voters seem prepared to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt: &quot;Part of this concern is a natural reflection of voter skepticism about the 
legislative process. Many Americans simply accept the notion that no matter how 
bad things are, Congress could make them worse.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-02-04T18:11:23-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">746</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-02-05T10:08:09-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Not Optmistic About Stimulous Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-02-05T10:08:09-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/114028/Slim-Majority-Supports-Economic-Stimulus-Plan.aspx&quot;&gt;According to a new poll, a scant majority of Americans support President Obama's proposed economic stimulous package pass by the House last night&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;As President Barack Obama tries to win over reluctant Republicans on his 
economic stimulus plan, a slim majority of the American public wants to see 
Congress pass the roughly $800 billion package of new government spending and 
tax breaks . . . 52% of the 
nation's adults are in favor of Congress passing the plan and 37% are opposed, 
while 11% have no opinion.&quot; A new Rasmussen survey, however, shows support for the package dipping well below maojority numbers: in the poll, likely voters support the measure 42% to 39% with 19% undecided.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-01-28T16:03:52-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">736</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-01-29T09:46:08-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Slim Majority Support Stimulous Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-01-29T11:17:32-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Will president-elect Obama make good on his promise to end partisan bickering in Washington? The answer may well determine the relative success or failure of his new iniatives, especially his effort to pass a comprehensive economic stimulous package. With little less than two weeks to go until the new president takes office, recent opinion polls suggest that Obama has made remarkable inroads with self-described &quot;conservative&quot; Americans: &quot;The extent to which Barack Obama is experiencing a post-election wave
of good will from Americans is born out by his base of supprt among these espondents: &quot;close to half of political
conservatives -- 45% -- say they are confident in Obama's ability to be a
good president. About the same percentage (46%) disagree.&quot; The 45% who say they are
confident in Obama contrasts with the
mere 23% of this group who supported him over John McCain in the
election. In the end, &quot;this relatively strong endorsement from conservatives boosts overall
confidence in Obama well beyond the 53% of the national vote he
received on Election Day.&quot; Overall, upawards of 65% to 70% of Americans now say they are
confident Obama will be a good president, while only 27% are not
confident and 8% are unsure. &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;suggests that the higher Obama's approval numbers with conservatives (and Republican voters of all stripes), the easier it may be for him to garner cross-over support in congress for a range of initiatives. This support may well tunr out to be the political cover right-of-center politicians will need to support Obama's programs.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-01-01T13:32:14-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">654</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-01-08T01:59:18-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Obama's America (Part 3): The State Of The Nation--A Sobered Opposition</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-01-08T02:03:40-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;With just a few weeks until Obama's inauguration, Americans remain worried and cautious about the state of energy and the nation's dependence on gasoline and other fossil fules. Nearly two in three Americans (64%)--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/113599/Despite-Cheaper-Gas-New-Driving-Habits-Sticking.aspx&quot;&gt;according to a recent Gallup survey&lt;/a&gt;--report adjusting their driving
habits in significant ways in response to surging gas prices earlier
this year, but only 12% have reverted to their old habits as prices at
the pump have plunged. Even as the price of a gallon of gas has fallen
below $2 in most areas, 52% of Americans say they have not gone back to
their old driving habits.&quot; These numbers suggest that Americans are reacting not only to the gravity of the energy crisis, but also are anxious about the economy and the effect of high energy and oil prices on their pocketbooks. As Gallup concludes: &quot;the plunge in gas prices is similar to distributing a huge tax rebate
by how much individuals drive. Like the tax rebate from earlier this
year, lower-income Americans tend to be most likely to spend the
rebate, but &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; Americans are likely to save a large portion
of any tax rebate. In part, it may be that most Americans have not gone
back to their old driving habits for fear that pump prices will surge
once more in the future. Just as likely, however, particularly for
upper-income Americans, returning to old driving habits may be a lot
like spending money -- something left for better times.&quot; It will be interesting to see the public response to energy use if oil prices begin to climb, the response of the White House and Congress, and the effect of both on the public's accessment of the Obama administration in the coming year.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-01-01T13:12:23-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">652</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-01-07T01:44:15-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Obama's America (Part 2): The State Of The Nation--Energy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-01-07T01:44:15-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;Over the next week, &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;will publish a daily, six-part series--&lt;em&gt;Obama's 
America: The State Of The Nation&lt;/em&gt;--that will examine public opinion and the attitudes of American voters about a 
range of issues facing the new president, from the economy and energy to voter 
expectations about the new administration. Collectively the series will offer a comprehensive look at the state of 
the nation through public opinion &lt;em&gt;on the ground &lt;/em&gt;as Obama takes office. Today's 
topic: &lt;em&gt;The Economy&lt;/em&gt;. Public reaction and response to the economic crisis has been 
mixed in recent weeks. For one, voters remain pessimistic about the economy: 
Nationally, only 9% of adults rate the economy as either good or excellent. 61% 
disagree and say the economy is in poor condition. Voters tend to support 
president-elect Obama's proposal for a comprehensive and massive stilumlous 
package: 56% of respondents say they favor the stimulus package that 
President-elect Barack Obama is proposing; 42% were opposed.The poll concludes: 
&quot;Two-thirds of the public thinks the stimulus package will do just that, with 
17% saying it will help the economy a lot and another 50% feeling that it will 
help the economy somewhat. 21% percent say the stimulus package won't help the 
economy very much and 10% say it won't help at all.&quot; Yet,&amp;nbsp; the recent economic 
crisis had led led &quot;mixed feelings&quot; about government intervention: 70% of 
respondents say a free market is better than one managed by the government. Just 
15% prefer a government-managed economy. 15% remain undecided. Still, a majority 
of voters--a healthy 52%--also believe there is a need for more government 
regulation of big business, although 35% disagree. 13% are unsure. These numbers suggest a highly vulnerable electorate, uncertain of the best way to handle the present economic crisis, unsure of how much government can do, but generally confident in the new president's ability to handle the situation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-01-01T14:59:49-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">655</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-01-06T06:42:37-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Obama's America (Part 1): The State Of The Nation--The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-01-06T06:42:37-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Americans remain optimistic about 2009, but still fear the effects of a recession most believe will be long-term. According to a new poll, Americans have a bit more confidence in 2009 than in the year 
that just passed, but 50% of adults believe the country will still be in a 
recession this time next year. 24% say 2008 was a good or excellent 
year, and 3% say it was the best year ever . . .&amp;nbsp; 38% rate 
2008 as poor. 32% expect 2009 to be good or excellent, 
with 5% more predicting it will be the best ever. 23% say it&amp;rsquo;s going to be a poor year.&quot; By contrast, a year ago 54% rated 2007 as either good, excellent or one of the best years 
ever for them personally. Only 20% gave it poor marks. 68% expected 2008 to be excellent, good 
or the best, with just 7% predicting poor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2009-01-02T11:23:59-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">657</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2009-01-02T11:23:59-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans See A Better 2009, Despite Fears About Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2009-01-02T21:29:48-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Are Americans getting a bit more optimistic about the ailing economy during this holiday seasn. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt;A new Rasmusen Consumer Index survey suggests that consumers are less anxious than they were even a week or two ago&lt;/a&gt;: The Consumer Index, which measures the &quot;economic 
confidence of consumers on a daily basis, rose a point on Monday to 61.9, its 
highest reading since December 12. Today's index is up two points from last 
week, but is down two points from the first reading of the month.&quot; Any improvement in Americans perception of the economy will be helpful to presisdent-elect Obama, whose first priority is to restore confidence in a public (and business community) that as grown increasingly pessimistic about the future.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-29T12:10:05-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">643</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-31T08:53:57-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Rasmussen: Consumer Confidence Up Slightly</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-31T08:53:57-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/indexes/rasmussen_consumer_index&quot;&gt;A new Rasmussen Reports survey&lt;/a&gt; suggests that Americans are not expecting an upturn in the economy any time soon. Nationally, only 9% of adults rate the economy as either good 
or excellent. 61% disagree and say the economy is in poor 
condition.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-28T11:23:27-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">640</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-30T09:59:30-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Remain Pessimistic About Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-30T09:59:30-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;American voters have mixed feelings about government's role in managing the economy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/voters_champion_free_market_but_want_more_regulation&quot;&gt;according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey&lt;/a&gt;. 70% of respondents say a free market is better than one managed by the government. Just 15% prefer a government-managed economy. 15% remain undecided. But as Rasmussen notes, the recent economic crisis had led led &quot;mixed feelings&quot; about government intervention: a majority of voters--a healthy 52%--also believe there is a
need for more government regulation of big business, although 35%
disagree. 13% are unsure.The survey concludes that voters overall &quot;are more ambivalent about the federal government&amp;rsquo;s role in the current economic crisis. 48% worry the government will do too much, while
41% fear it will do too little. 11% are not sure which
is a greater concern. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of voters agree, however, that
government and big business often work together in ways that hurt
consumers and investors. Only 15% of voters don&amp;rsquo;t believe that is true,
and 20% are undecided.&quot; This ambivalence suggests a very tricky political landscape for the incoming president who must balance the need for federal regulation with broadly held views about American capitalism and economic freedom and self-determination.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-29T19:31:07-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">646</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-30T09:57:38-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Mixed In Their Views Of Government Economic Regulation</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-30T09:57:38-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/23/economy.stimulus/index.html&quot;&gt;a new CNN/Opinion Research survey&lt;/a&gt;, 56% of respondents say they favor the stimulus package that
President-elect Barack Obama is proposing; 42% were opposed.The poll concludes: &quot;Two-thirds of the public thinks the
stimulus package will do just that, with 17% saying it will help
the economy a lot and another 50% feeling that it will help the
economy somewhat. 21% percent say the stimulus package won't
help the economy very much and 10% say it won't help at all. Yet, respondents appear to be split on the issue of government
regulation of business and industry, with &quot;39% saying there's too
much government regulation and an equal amount saying too little.
20% said the amount of government involvement is just right.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-28T11:20:28-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">639</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-29T01:25:20-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Most Americans Support Obama Stimulous Package</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-29T01:25:20-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/auto_industry/49_oppose_loans_to_failing_automakers&quot;&gt;A new national poll reports that nearly half of U.S. voters &lt;/a&gt;(49%) &quot;oppose President Bush&amp;rsquo;s 
decision to extend $17.4 billion in emergency taxpayer-backed loans to the 
failing U.S. auto industry, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national 
telephone survey. 38% are in favor of the president&amp;rsquo;s 
decision, which he announced Friday, while 13% are undecided. The day before, 
Bush acknowledged that he has been forced to turn his back on many of the 
free-market principles he believes in because of the severity of the country&amp;rsquo;s 
economic situation.&quot; President-elect Obama also supports the auto bailout.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-23T17:36:40-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">637</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-24T09:43:14-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Continue To Oppose Auto Bailout</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-24T09:43:14-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In a new hurdle for the incoming Obama administration, voters are growing increasingly pessimistic about their personal finances. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/113506/About-40-Americans-Worrying-About-Money.aspx&quot;&gt;According to a new Gallup survey&lt;/a&gt;, About 40% of Americans on average are &quot;currently worrying about money,
sustaining a slight but significant increase in worry compared to
readings before September of this year . . . Americans' self-reports that they worried about money began 2008
near 30% on average, and then rose to an average of about 35% through
the end of the summer. Then, as was the case for other consumer
economic measures Gallup tracks, financial worry begin to rise in mid-
to late September, coincident with the highly publicized credit crisis.
The average worry level peaked at about 45% in early October, and has
fallen back slightly since, generally remaining above the 40% level.
The notable exception was a drop in financial worry around the
Thanksgiving holiday . . . The large sample sizes involved in this
tracking -- about 3,500 interviews per seven-day rolling average --
underscore the conclusion that while the increase in worry is not large
on an absolute basis, it is significant and meaningful.&quot; &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;notes that such negative sentiment can actually contribute to an economic downturn, functioning as a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy in which consumers--fearful of their personal economic future--begin to radically alter their spending habits.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-21T11:37:44-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">631</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-23T09:10:13-05:00</published-at>
    <title>New Hurdle For Obama: Voters Are Growing Pessimistic About The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-23T09:10:13-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Voter concerns about the econony are as high as they've been in three decades, since the fiscal meltdown of the mid-1970s. According to a new &lt;em&gt;ABC News/Washington Post&lt;/em&gt; survey, &quot;job insecurity is its worst in 33 years of polls; holiday spending plans, their worst in data back 23 years. Americans report cuts in work hours and pay, and concerns about making the rent or mortgage, heating the house, paying for retirement. In all it&amp;rsquo;s an extraordinary loss of confidence &amp;ndash; with repercussions in families across economic and political lines. . . 63% now think the country is in a 'long-term economic decline,' up from 49% 10 months ago; just a third say the economic system is still &amp;ldquo;basically pretty solid.&amp;rdquo; And while economic distress tends to be greatest among lower-income Americans, the biggest increase in views of a long-term decline has been among the better-off, hammered by the stock market.&quot; In a separate barometer of the nation's economic health, Separately, the weekly ABC News Consumer Comfort Index is in &quot;the midst of its worst stretch since it began 23 years ago: Just 7% of Americans say the economy&amp;rsquo;s in&lt;br /&gt;good shape, 22% call it a good time to spend money and fewer than half, 44%, rate their personal finances positively.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-17T18:21:53-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">619</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-18T09:18:19-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Concerns About The Economy Are Highest in Three Decades</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-18T09:18:19-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A new poll out from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/november_2008/55_confident_that_obama_s_team_will_beat_back_economic_woes&quot;&gt;Rasmussen &lt;/a&gt;reports that a majority of voters are confident that Obama--and his economic team--can solve the nation's economic woes: &quot;55% of Americans are at least somewhat 
confident that Barack Obama's economic team can 
lead the country out of its current economic problems. 25% 
are very confident. Only 13% are not at all confident in the new team, and 5% are undecided.&quot; Interestingly, investors are less enthusiastic about the Obama economic team, with 48% somewhat confident in the president-elect&amp;rsquo;s choices, including 20% who 
are very confident. 63% of non-investors are somewhar confident, while 32% are very confident. 16% of investors are not at all 
confident in the new economic team, compared to 10% of non-investors.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-12-02T23:57:50-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">558</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean">false</photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-12-03T10:01:14-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Rasmussen: 55% of Voters Are Confident That Obama Will Solve Economic Crisis</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-12-03T10:01:14-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Despite relatively high marks for the Obama transition effort, American voters remain pessimistic about the new president's ability to manage the economy. As a &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1079a1Transition.pdf&quot;&gt;new ABC News survey reports&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Expectations of Obama&amp;rsquo;s economic performance are highly partisan. Just 16% of Republicans expect him to be able to accomplish a 'great deal' or 'good amount' to improve the economy, essentially unchanged from election eve. At the same time, that expectation has declined among Democrats and independents alike (by 9 and 10 points, respectively), suggesting a more sober post-election assessment in these groups. Obama himself, in introducing his economic team today, pledged fast work&lt;br /&gt;but also said the economy 'is likely to get worse before it gets better.'&amp;rdquo; The ABC News analysis continues: &quot;Given the larger forces at work, relatively few Americans, 24 percent overall, expect the incoming president to be able to do 'a great deal' to improve the economy. That&amp;rsquo;s even though it was the single most dominant issue of the campaign, and Obama&amp;rsquo;s ability to connect with the public&amp;rsquo;s economic concerns that lifted him to his Nov. 4 victory.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-11-25T12:52:36-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">526</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-11-26T12:40:26-05:00</published-at>
    <title>ABC NEWS Poll: Americans Skeptical About Obama's Ability to Repair Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-11-26T15:57:18-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;On 18 September 2008, &lt;em&gt;PollTrack's&lt;/em&gt; tally of electoral votes was starting to suggest that McCain was beginning to pull ahead of Obama: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;McCain-216 Obama-202 Too Close To Call-120&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. In the following weeks these numbers would steadily reverse in the wake of a comment made by the Republican nominee just days before the harrowing dimensions of the Wall Street Crisis and subsequent economic meltdown would be known: &lt;em&gt;&quot;The fundamentals of the economy are strong.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; When the history of the extraordinary 2008 campaign is written, it is this sentence that will read as one of the greatest game changers of the race. The remark, in and of itself, may not have been fatal for another candidate. For McCain, however, it achieved one of the most damaging results in politics--affirming the electorate's underlying anxiety or fears about a candidate. Earlier in the primary season, McCain admitted that the economy was not his strong suit. A nation on the brink of economic disaster is a frightened nation; the gnawing sense that the Republican candidate--not to mention a Republican party widely blamed by voters for the economic mess--was not competent on the economy transformed McCain into the risker choice. Yet, public opinion on the subject changed relatively slowly. On September 20th, &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;observed the following: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/110536/Wall-Street-Crisis-May-Give-Obama-Slight-Political-Benefit.aspx&quot;&gt;&quot;Gallup &lt;/a&gt;reports a slight--&lt;em&gt;but only slight&lt;/em&gt;--benefit
for Obama in the voters' candidate preferences, vis-a-vis the current
economic crisis--'Even though Americans divide evenly as to which
candidate can better
handle the Wall Street crisis, Barack Obama seems to benefit
politically, as slightly more voters say it increases their likelihood
of voting for him (29%) than say it makes them more likely to vote for
John McCain (23%)'&quot; As time passed, however, and voters became more worried, they took notice of Obama's cool, steady, and authoritative demeanor. If voters approached the first debate demoralized and frightened by the economic news that resonated around them, they also approached the event with a sense of longing--desire for problem solving and intelligent, wise leadership and action. In the end, many voters felt safe with the Democrat, unnerved by the Republican, and desirous of change.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-11-06T09:36:28-05:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">468</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-11-06T09:45:22-05:00</published-at>
    <title>Why Obama Won: &quot;The Fundamentals Of The Economy Are Strong&quot;</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-11-06T09:45:22-05:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;In yet another indication of the potential for the economy to impact on this election, a just released&lt;em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/111175/TwoThirds-Americans-Financially-Hurt-Crisis.aspx&quot;&gt;USA Today&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/111175/TwoThirds-Americans-Financially-Hurt-Crisis.aspx&quot;&gt;/Gallup &lt;/a&gt;poll finds &quot;66% of Americans saying the
events of the last month have harmed their own financial situations,
and an even more ominous 70% thinking the events of the past two weeks
will hurt them financially in the long run.&quot; Yet, with a number of newly released tracking polls suggesting that the race may be tightening--Gallup's own tracker suggests a virtual tie using its traditional likely voter model--Obama 49% to McCain 47%--it is unclear how the bad economic news will ultimately influence the election.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-16T14:21:45-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">277</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-16T14:46:58-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Preoocupied With The Faltering Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-16T14:46:58-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Just how much is the issue of &quot;experience&quot; a factor in this election? On the surface, McCain's relative experience versus Obama's relative youth might seem like a plus for the Republican. When voters are anxious, they often inflect their own sense of instability onto the nation, and vice versa. And when voters feel unstable, they sometimes go towards the candidate they perceive as more familiar and experienced (thus, American voters do not vote out incumbent presidents in time of war). Sometimes during exceedingly difficult times, however, voters turn against the status quo--the fateful&amp;nbsp; 1932 victory of Franklin Delano Roosevelt comes to mind--especially as they grow more familiar and comfortable with a &quot;riskier&quot; candidate who espouses dramatic change. Indeed, it was not until the last week of the 1980 campaign, another trying economic time, that Ronald Reagan wrapped up the election, having convinced millions of voters through a calming and commanding debate performance that he was not the right-wing extremist some feared. The present-day economic meltdown, and the anxiety it engenders in voters, has created an opening for Obama. In recent weeks, he has emerged as the reassuring candidate by appearing level-headed in a time of crisis, a quality communicated through his thoughtful and measured debate performances. Whether the Democrat will finally seal the deal with American voters may depend on three factors: [1] if he continues to be seen as the candidate who can best handle the failing economy (given the tendency of voters to blame Republicans for the present-day economic failures, Obama has a decided advantage in this regard); [2] if undecided or wavering voters can get past their anxieties, uncertainty, or prejudices about him; and [3] if the economy--and not another pressing domestic or international event--remains the number one issue on election
day.&lt;/p&gt; </body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-09T12:20:15-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">231</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-12T09:28:07-04:00</published-at>
    <title>The &quot;Experience&quot; Issue</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-12T09:28:07-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;How scared are Americans about the current economic crisis? So afraid, according to analysts that their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/business/06econ.html?ref=business&quot;&gt;&quot;confidence may have been too shaken for them to 
resume their free-spending ways any time soon.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; This crisis of confidence is, no doubt, an important reason for McCain's dip in the polls. The tendency of most voters to blame the economic meltdown on the present administration--and on Republicans in general--may be transforming McCain into the riskier alternative for many. (According a just released &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/06/cnn-poll-obama-advantage-grows/&quot;&gt;CNN/Opinion Research&lt;/a&gt; national survey, &quot;56% say McCain's
policies would be the same as Bush's, up from 50% a month ago.&quot;)
Questions about a candidate's personality, character, patriotism. or identity--directly or indirectly raised by the McCain campaign, for example, with regard to Obama's perceived liberalism, elitism, otherness, or aloofness--can drive an election in a time of relative stability (the ease with which&amp;nbsp; George H. W. Bush was able to paint Michael Dukakis as an elitist, tax-and-spend liberal with un-American values is a case in point). But in a time of war or crisis, voters may be far more inclined to cast their vote for the candidate they believe can best bring about stability or assure their safety (indeed, American voters have not turned out an incumbent president in a time of war, to wit: 2004). The big question: have voters made up their minds? Have they decided that Obama is the more reassuring choice in a frightening time&amp;nbsp; (regardless of their doubts about his experience, race, or politics)? Or can the Republicans reignite voter doubts this week by recirculating stories about the Democrat's controversial associates (such as his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Jr. or Williams Ayers, one of the founders of the radical Weathermen group)?&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-06T14:53:44-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">206</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-06T17:14:29-04:00</published-at>
    <title>How Scared Are American Voters?</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-06T17:24:46-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/voters_divided_on_whether_wall_street_should_clean_up_its_own_mess&quot;&gt;Rasmussen &lt;/a&gt;reports that American voters are evenly split on the bailout question: &quot;Voters are evenly divided over whether Congress should take 
action to help the troubled financial industry or just let Wall 
Street work out its problems on its own, according to a new Rasmussen Reports 
national telephone survey. Forty-five percent (45%) say Congress should take action, but 
44% say Wall Street and the financial industry should take care of their own 
problems. Eleven percent (11%) are undecided.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-10-01T10:59:36-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">170</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-10-01T10:59:36-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Americans Evenly Divided On Wall Street Bailout</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-10-01T11:00:47-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NC_929.pdf&quot;&gt;Public Policy Polling&lt;/a&gt; survey, released this afternoon, reveals one important reason for Obama's dramatic upswing in North Carolina: the economy. The poll found that, &quot;over the last year there's been a strong relationship between the 
number of North Carolinians listing the economy as their biggest concern, and 
Obama's standing in the polls. In January when just 39% of voters said it was 
their biggest issue John McCain led by 14 points. In August with it up to 48% 
Obama trailed by just three. Last week with 58% listing it number one the race 
was tied, and now with the number up to a record 64% Obama has taken a small 
lead. He is up 55-38 among respondents citing the economy as their main 
concern.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city nil="true"></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name nil="true"></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-29T18:11:00-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">151</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-09-29T19:55:25-04:00</published-at>
    <title>North Carolina: It's The Economy</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-30T01:27:20-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday's &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;daily tracking average gave Obama a significant 6.3% edge. These results suggest that last week was a bad one for John McCain. His assertion that the &quot;fundamentals of the economy are strong&quot;--just days before the full gravity of our economic crisis became clear did not help his numbers. Surveys last week also indicated that the electorate is inclined to blame Republicans for the economic mess. Additionally, Sarah Palin took a hammering in the media as did McCain's effort to suspend his campaign. The big question: has the economic crisis--and McCain's response to it--provided Obama with an opening? Do Obama's numbers indicate that the tide is turning in election 2008? Or will the pendulum swing back in the coming weeks? October is a tricky month in presidential campaigns, a time when voter sentiment can harden, but also a period in which the debates, political strategies, and unexpected news events have made a difference (to wit, the expression, &quot;October Surprise&quot;). Al Gore began October 2000 with an large deficit in the polls. By month's end, he was tied with his opponent, winning 500,000 more votes than George W. Bush on election day. Conversely, in October 1988, a series of withering Republican campaign commercials and weak debate performances by Democrat Michael Dukakis resulted in a durable Republican advantage that carried George H. W. Bush well across the finish line. Yet, in 1980, the one--and only debate--between Reagan and Carter in late October shook up a heretofore tied up race and yielded the Republican a stable and significant lead. One &lt;em&gt;major &lt;/em&gt;qualifier: US presidential elections are not decided by the popular vote (as 2000 dramatically confirmed). In this sense, neither candidate has come anywhere near sealing the deal. In fact, from an electoral perspective, the race is closer to a tie than Obama's modest national lead might suggest. More later.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city nil="true"></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name nil="true"></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-28T19:27:13-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">146</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-09-29T09:47:43-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Will The Economic Crisis Have A Lasting Effect On Election 2008?</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-30T01:27:20-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;The country is divided on more than just the election. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/23/tepid_public_approval_for_fed.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post-ABC News&lt;/a&gt; poll
released yesterday reports that the American public is &quot;evenly divided on the recent steps taken by
the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department to rescue the financial
services industry -- 44% approve, 42% disapprove. Skepticism cuts across party lines: &quot;Approval is under
50 percent among Republicans (49%), independents (46%) and Democrats
(42%).&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city nil="true"></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name nil="true"></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-23T17:15:27-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">120</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-09-24T09:15:04-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Public Skeptical About Wall Street Bailout</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-30T01:27:20-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/22/republicans-blamed-obama-gains-over-financial-crisis/&quot;&gt;CNN/Opinion Research Corporation &lt;/a&gt;survey released today reports that registered voters, by a two to one margin &quot;blame Republicans over Democrats for the financial
crisis that has swept across the country the past few weeks &amp;mdash; one
factor that may have contributed to an apparent increase in Barack
Obama&amp;rsquo;s edge over John McCain in the race for the White House.&quot; CNN continues: &quot;47 percent of registered voters questioned say Republicans are more
responsible for the problems currently facing financial institutions
and the stock market, with 24 percent saying Democrats are more
responsible. One in five of those polled blame both parties equally,
and 8 percent say neither party is to blame.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city nil="true"></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name nil="true"></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-22T19:18:30-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">113</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-09-22T19:18:30-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Voters Blame Republicans For Financial Crisis: An Obama Advantage?</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-30T01:27:20-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
  <post>
    <author-id type="integer">1</author-id>
    <blog-id type="integer">1</blog-id>
    <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/110536/Wall-Street-Crisis-May-Give-Obama-Slight-Political-Benefit.aspx&quot;&gt;Gallup &lt;/a&gt;reports a slight--&lt;em&gt;but only slight&lt;/em&gt;--benefit for Obama in the voters' candidate preferences, vis-a-vis the current economic crisis: &quot;Even though Americans divide evenly as to which candidate can better
handle the Wall Street crisis, Barack Obama seems to benefit
politically, as slightly more voters say it increases their likelihood
of voting for him (29%) than say it makes them more likely to vote for
John McCain (23%)&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</body>
    <contributor-city nil="true"></contributor-city>
    <contributor-name nil="true"></contributor-name>
    <contributor-state-id type="integer" nil="true"></contributor-state-id>
    <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-20T13:14:59-04:00</created-at>
    <id type="integer">101</id>
    <photo-essay type="boolean" nil="true"></photo-essay>
    <published type="boolean">true</published>
    <published-at type="datetime">2008-09-20T13:14:59-04:00</published-at>
    <title>Gallup: Economic Crisis of Slight Benefit to Obama</title>
    <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-30T01:27:20-04:00</updated-at>
    <view-count type="integer" nil="true"></view-count>
  </post>
</posts>
